All the World is a Stage

A very famous playwright coined this idea many years ago;

All the world is a stage

and all the men and women merely players,

Each has his entrances and his exits,

A friend of mine, who lived alone, wanted to move house. The reason was that one of her neighbours had lost her husband. Maybe her friend would now sell up and move away. The pond in which she swam was now missing a fish and more might go. Soon it would be empty. Moving house and finding new friends seemed a good idea.

I suggested that moving house may not solve the problem. I proposed that our lives consist of three things. The ‘scenery’, the ‘actors’ and the ‘story’. Each is as important as the other and all are fundamental to enjoying life. Merely changing the scenery will not necessarily invite new characters and a new story.

For example, foreign holidays are popular with many people. It’s a way of packing up and ‘leaving everything behind’. As I once overheard a man say in the queue for passports about his holiday, ‘you have to get away from staring at the same four walls.’

The backdrops to our lives do become visually repetitive.

Either this wallpaper goes or I do!’ – Oscar Wilde

Even the daily journey to work becomes an extension of the wallpaper and we begin to detest it, whether it is the inside of a car or private Lear Jet. So the simplistic solution we take is to change it; even if only for a couple of weeks each year. Off we go to the Balearic’s with all our ‘bare necessities’ in a suitcase or three, our beloved partner and a smile of expectation. Expectation because you know the hotel; you should do…it’s been your holiday destination for the last fifteen years.

For some, this is all the scenery change they can handle. There is comfort when they know what to expect. They know where their favourite restaurant is, the best bars. Some vacationers are more adventurous in their scenery choice. They go to different hotels each year or even different countries. If you have enough money, today the sky is no longer the limit. You can ‘Spacecation’.

But again, life or rather our expectations of life, let us down. After two weeks we are bored walk of the beach and the frog in the shower and the hotel mini bus that is always full. We begin to long for home.

Going abroad has not even changed the people in our lives, unless we were lucky enough to find a ‘holiday romance’ or get the phone number of the ‘nice couple we met on the plane’. We went with the wife or husband and we return with the wife or husband. The rows on the hotel balcony pushed down into the suitcase of our mind, strapped up and locked away until another time.

It is easy to change the scenery but changing the characters, that is something different. Families are by definition almost, designed to stay together whatever happens. They are our insurance policy to support us through whatever troubles life brings. Families do break up but it is better they do not.

Friends are great but from the day we are capsized out of Junior School, we realise friends we love, disappear. Only the very best of friendships will sustain you through all of your tempests and becalments.

And the world of work will treat us with more indifference than is good for us. If there is a reason why the company needs to cut staff, then the company comes before your mortgage repayments. You are out.

The characters in our life are born and pass away before our eyes, sometimes quite literally. We become resigned to the phases of life. When we are young new characters keep appearing. They amuse and delight us and then are gone.

When we are old, the characters who we have held dear, fall off the calendar until we are left alone and awaiting our cue to exit, stage left or right.

And as if this warp and weft of life is not complexity enough there is the third dimension, and the one which troubles or delights us most; the story.

Think back to your favourite movie. Whilst you will remember some of the backdrops to the scenes, some of the performances and appearances of the actors, it is the story which holds fast in your memory. Human beings are hard wired to remember stories as we do melodies.

We spend our childhoods dreaming of what we are going to become; explorers, pilots, politicians, film stars! The stories we aspire to are almost always unrealistic. That is after all, the nature of dreams is;

If we shadows have offended,
Think but this, and all is mended,
That you have but slumber’d here
While these visions did appear.
And this weak and idle theme,
No more yielding but a dream,
Gentles, do not reprehend:
if you pardon, we will mend:…’

from ‘Midsummer Nights Dream’ epilogue, William Shakespeare

We watch one or two grown ups who have been in the right scene at the right time with the right character and have been given an opportunity to reach for a goal they never dreamed would come. It did, which makes the rest of us think our ‘fifteen minutes of fame’ will come to us to. Perhaps it will.

But the movie in which you have the staring role, is not remotely likely to bring you fame. Be it ever so humble, we should not be ashamed of an uneventful life. While we are responsible for how we respond to opportunities in life, we are not responsible for the ‘hard knocks’, false starts, mirages, tricksters, fraudsters, liers, cheats, charlatans, and ‘low ballers’ that knock us off our feet.

Two dimensional life is just about management. Holidays are fun. But when you add the third dimension of a narrative, you had better be ready to run. And remember, like Tom and Jerry, the wallpaper of life is on a very very very long roll.

The Space Time Cage

The standard monkey cage encloses a space using three dimensional planes; x,y and z.

Take one standard monkey, place him in the cage and it’s game over for monkey freedom.

Humans also occupy a cage only it is less simple to observe – because it is infinite. We live in an ‘infinity monkey cage’ in which we can travel in any direction – but with the restrictions of always coming back to the start.

Then it gets complicated. Scientists measure time; from leaky water clocks to atom accurate atomic clocks. This single act of measurement creates a past and a future – pressing our minds into an ever smaller space, or is that a larger one? Either way it puts human endeavour into a tight spot.

Things must be done ‘on time’. In a kind of cosmic act of cookery, we are placed in a dome shaped oven to cook for a measured period and then emerge as plump loaves of bread. The cosmic clock is not our friend but our enemy, for it cannot be beaten. It ticks inexorably in the background of all our endeavours.

picture credit My Modern Met

This dominant dimension in our lives – I would argue it is not a dimension at all. The act of measuring a thing will not make it real if it is imaginary. Can you measure freedom?

Time picks us up and places us in a social order on a point of singularity within the Universe; it is called ‘being born’.

And as we grow into adults we accept this social order. We indulge in it’s whims which are justified as ethical (providing complexity and contradiction are ignored) and therefore acceptable. If you reject the ‘normal’ of that moment, you must risk being regarded as ‘not normal’.

An 18th century normal is not a 19th century normal. Slavery – which had been around for thousands of years – was voted out as unethical.

Humans were not learning but unlearning bad habits. It was never ‘natural’ to enslave your own species. Nature (if ever) rarely does it. This change in human consciousness was restricted by time. Slaves had been enslaved for millennia. Eventually, for ethical reasons – slaves were released to live in social equality.

It was just an imaginary game that had been played out by the victors at the cost of ruining millions of lives and their descendants.

Were there Roman aristocrats who refused to have slaves? I don’t know but such a person would have been described as ‘out of their time’.

Human societies evolve – not because of time but despite time. Some evolutionary steps are incredibly slow, but if you can not measure time, that is an invisible transition.

There is no ‘one direction’ for human evolution. We have freewill so do not hit the bars of the space cage, just as we do not hit the bars of the time cage. This fact alone should make us query the reality of space and time.

Are they not mere conventions?

Of course without matter and gravity we could not walk to the shops for a pint of milk, but physicality was only ever, a compromise. By shedding our acceptance of what is ‘normal’ or ‘fixed’ or ‘normal’ we edge closer to the reality of an infinite space.

The ‘man of the age’ who is lauded as a hero, is not a better human being. They are simply so much caught in the conventional illusion of what matters and what does not – that they go along with the fickle opinions of others – especially if they are being flattered.

The true ‘hero of the age’ is not of the age they appear to others to be in. Such a person acts independent of time either as a scientist like Nicola Tesla, an artist like Leonardo de Vinci or any of the prophets.

picture credit: Ivanep

Examine the words of their words and their thoughts are independent of space and time.

They uncover / reveal / expound truths which are out of ‘time’ and ‘space’. Their starting and finishing point is infinite and exist in every reality.

Such truths as ‘love one another’ and 1+1=2, subvert corruption in human societies. They ‘unpeeled’ coverings that have been revealed as real in previous centuries. They will always be true.

Man has not been on Earth for long. If Earth was created in 1000AD then we came along on 22 December 1999. We are no more than a passing thought created just in time for the end of the year. It would do us well to remember how truly insignificant humans really are but some of us, sometimes, get a glimpse of infinity, a quality which is not ours to hold.

The Arc – part two

My personal interpretation of the flood-myth story departs from the account in the Old Testament of the Bible. I take issue with the simplistic account of wild animals compliantly lining up in pairs. We are told that the majority (seven of each) of the animals were domesticated, not wild and selected as food for Noah and his tribe. Therefore, I suggests that the only live animals taken onboard the ark were domesticated. Could it not have been that a considerable amount of work had gone into transforming wild species into domesticated varieties?

There was a strong motive to harness the power of a giant Aurochs in a ‘lite’ version which we now know in bovine form as bulls and cows.

picture credit Wikipaedia
An Auroch

Animals supported the burgeoning transition into settlements and farming. There is evidence from the excavations at Gobleki Teke in Anatolia that the monolithic structures there were created by agricultural communities 5000 years before the ‘official’ date. Nobody knows who these communities were but the appearance of the Mullilu ‘bags’ carved onto one stone, suggests an intriguing link with the Annunaki.

picture credit: Wikipeadia – Goblekli Tepe in Anatolia Turkey – the so called Vulture Stone

So we should not be surprised when we see mummified pussy cats in Ancient Egypt. Domestication of big cats to, presumably rid grain stores of vermin, lead to the creation of the domesticated feline. She was even elevated to the position of ‘god’ and many statues of her exist, as do mummified cats in such numbers their bodies were once burnt for heating.

The final step in this theory and certainly the most disturbing and controversial is that homo sapiens are ourselves domesticated animals, not for food but also as genetically engineered ‘gods’. Animals so beautifully perfect in their form that cosmic consciousness felt free to enter and inhabit human bodies as ‘soul’.

Let us return to the animals being selected to be preserved in the Arc. Should we take at face value the account in the Bible?

The reference to the animals going into the arc ‘two by two’ is a conspicuous detail. Why state this? Why not explain what happened to the plant, reptile, bird and insect kingdoms? And there is surely a fascinating tale to tell about the animals that did not survive, such as Unicorns.

The omissions are glaring, including the assumption that Noah and his family were the only humans at that time to own a boat. Many other races survived to tell the tale, one on similar lines as Noah only perhaps with smaller boats and their own food banks; we have their stories so no proof is needed on that point.

With reference to the Biblical version, we might ask why the precise dimensions of the ship were worth recording. If there is any detail we require it is its means of propulsion, navigation and anchoring. If we are examine the credibility of the Arc’s uncontrolled travels on a tempestuous ocean, it is hard to take it literally.

A boat, loaded with wild carnivorous animals, was always going to be an impossibility. How do you stop the animals eating each other like they do in nature? A powerless and rudderless ship was more likely to hit a mountain top and sink, than preserve life with a big L.

Picture credit: Pinterest King Solomon’s First Temple with the Molten Sea supported by animals in the foreground

Was the Arc really a ship? Since the proportions of the Arc in the Bible are given as a cubic rectangular shape, I personally think it more likely it was a giant building. The dimensions of the Arc are exactly proportional to the First Temple of Jerusalem, which of course, was a building. Not only that but there is a truth in the creation of similar geometric forms at different scales, what we call today, fractals. The proportions demonstrate a complete understand of the Divine mathematics that governs all Creation. Perfect mathematical proportions are beauty and beauty is Divine.

So perhaps the Arc was a beautiful and functional building. Perched on a mountain top it would have had a far better chance of surviving. There might even have been several such buildings scattered around the globe around the world erected by different cultures and described, we know, in their own myths. After all, there was no real rush. To flood the world would have taken several hundreds if not thousands of years.

What we are missing in the Bible is an overview. Perhaps it has been over redacted over time, but certainly the Annunaki put a lot of effort into fine tuning a wobbling world so that it could emerge from catastrophe completely cleansed of impurity.

An Annunaki with Tree of Life in background

When we look at the records of how the Annunaki Sumerian gods are repeatedly depicted in pictures, they are standing either side of a flowering tree, a ‘tree of life’. This firstly gives us an idea of a ‘family tree’ with it’s various branches – genetic connections – as in ‘royal family’. The ‘blue blood’ of the modern royals might well be a linguistic remnant of the reptilian DNA in humans.

The pictures are intriguing. In one hand the ‘god’ or ‘demi-god’ is holding one of those bags already mentioned, and in the other, something resembling a fir cone. The bracelet contains a clue; an eleven petalled flower and a central ovary, one for each month of the solar year.

Pine cones are counter clockwise spiral forms that obey the arithmetical, Fibonacci growth patterns. They hint, symbolically, of the process of genetic engineering and or horticultural hybridisation. The seeds of a pine cone are fractals of a tree in nascence, and seeds is where this hypothesis goes next.

There are very few contemporary descriptions of what the ‘fir cone’ and ‘bag’ represent. However there is one translation from the Acadian language which uses the word, BANDUDDU or ‘Turkish Pine Cone’. The bag is a MULLILU or ‘purifier’. If we accept that the Sumerian gods were active in global DNA management, part of that process would be to eradicate unwanted elements of DNA, or as it is known today, ‘gene editing’. It was vital that disease and inferior life was eradicated or ‘purified’, for future generations, whether prior to a catastrophe or in micro-management of earth’s delicate ecosystems. At another level it was vital that humans became able to access ever increasing levels of consciousness.

picture credit: Wakehurst Place, Sussex, the Millenium Seed Bank

The subject of genes returns us to this ‘two by two’ anachronistic detail. It is an interestingly similar mathematical picture of the double helix of mitochondrial DNA. Could Noah’s Arc have been a bank of DNA? Does the Mullilu contain genetically altered / improved pollen to fertilise the tree of life? Small bags, even today, usually contain light, high value items. (One of the strategy’s adopted by the scientists today in order to preserve life in the event of a global catastrophe is to create seed banks.)

Should we be surprised that DNA codes are binary and there are two sets of two letters to describe them; A and C = 0 / G and T = 1. As we know, 0 and 1 is the binary language of computers. This code and it’s most recent ‘quantum’ addition (neither 0 nor 1) is now understood by many scientists to be how not only life forms are described, but the whole fractal universe. This is why beings from infinitely large distances away can come to our small planet and know the deep structures, or programming, of our three dimensional existence. It’s the same everywhere in the binary code Universe…two by two.

The Tree of Life

The Arc

Adam and Eve were having a blissful time in the Garden of Eden. They had booked to visit the Tigris and Euphrates river valleys and were not disappointed. However hotel hospitality standards fell when Eve leaned over the balcony and was faced with a firey eyed reptilian. She was reassured when she saw it wore a elegant bow tie and a wide jawed smile. It held a shining fruit in it’s jaws, as if it knew she had missed breakfast that morning. The rest, as they say, is history.

Within all the stories of the beginning times of humanity there is one scientific question that as yet, needs proof. It is the ‘missing link’. The problem is that homo sapiens appear to have no ancestor. We may be 98% similar in our DNA to our Chimpanzee cousins but compare the two species, and the difference is obvious.

If no ‘missing link’ is to make an appearance in fossils, let us test another hypothesis. Suppose that homo sapiens were visited by beings from other dimensions and / or space time realities? Well, yes, that is a big leap into the unproven, but no more than Conquistadors landing in Central America or Captain Cook landing in North Island, New Zealand. Cultures historically, attract unexpected visitors. Sometimes the meeting is destructive bringing plague and disease and sometimes constructive, bringing new technology and ideas. Usually it is a mixture of both and those who think it shouldn’t happen or apologies are due, might reflect on this very human vulnerability and how blame is not the solution.

So here we have these early humans romping around the Garden of Eden without a care in the world. That is until the rules changed. The new rule, a poisoned chalice in effect, was ‘freewill’.

Such a gift, if humans are involved, was always going to get out of control. A ‘guide’ was needed and one may say that time was right for a radiant being or beings to appear, in computer terms, a ‘security patch’ for humanity. Fairly far fetched hypothesis you might say, but then, so were ships with sails appearing on the horizon for the Aztecs.

If this hypothesis deserves exploration, we need evidence. Well there is evidence but not conclusive evidence. We might start with the Bible as a source.

In The Book of Daniel we find a race known as ‘The Watchers’ meaning ‘those who are awake‘ or ‘guardians‘. Nebuchadnezzar described them as ‘a watcher, a holy one come down from heaven‘. Biblical scholars want to interpret Watchers as ‘angels’. Whatever they were, we are told that they came from above.

How can we be sure of that? Well, if we change sources to earlier writings, then the Sumerian texts record the presence on Earth of a race they call the ‘Anunnaki’. Translated this also means, ‘those who came from Heavens to Earth‘ – remarkably similar to The Watchers. A Victorian scholar name Nathaniel Schmidt was one of the first to translate the Sumerian cuneiform tablets; some of the earliest written records. He read of contact between humans and the Anunnaki They appear to have been a benign influence whose intent was to aid the development of humans.

If we seek evidence other than the written Sumerian records, then there are thousands of ancient visual depictions of ‘non-human beings’ in pictures and sculptures. If we dismiss these as ‘myths’ or ‘imagination’ how can we account for those that are from different cultures?

These figures are often oversized, that is several times the average height of a homo sapien. Could this genetic mix account for why the skeletons of ‘giants’, found all over the world. The presence of giants such as Goliath fighting in warring armies, gives a reminder that size is just a matter of scaling up. This is more practical for cold blooded rather than warm blooded creatures…hence the giant reptilians of the Carboniferous era.

Giantism; a genetic characteristic that is still with us

Gilgamesh is a well known character who appears on the Sumerian ‘Kings List’. He is described as a hybrid between human and non-human. It is undeniably possible that Anunnaki bred with humans either physically, or genetically using techniques common today that we call ‘test tube babies’.

If the ‘missing link’ is ever to be explained, could this be it?

Humans went from being descendants of the Garden of Eden to being a ‘super race’ who lived for hundreds – even thousands of years as, ancient texts record, were the Sumerian Kings. One early such king was recorded as living for 43,200 years. Should we dismiss this as fantasy? Sumer gave us the sexigesimal system of time recording and were exact and prolific at recording in general, so we must have good reason to dismiss their historical records as wrong.

The Sumerian texts shows us a dark side to the Anunnaki. In their version of creation myth there are two demi-gods. Enki wants to upgrade humans to enjoy a more conscious life and this conflicts with Enlil, so Enki breaks ranks. Enlil wants to destroy the planet. Enki gives instructions to Noah for his family and farm to be saved.

Those lead by Enlil wanted to use humans as a work force to mine minerals such as gold in South Africa, on behalf of their non-human superiors. Following the ways in which colonies change over time, the the colonisers returned to their own dominions while still receiving the riches of Earth for their own purposes.

All of this was happening pre-flood. The last Sumerian dynasty before the flood lasted 241000 years and was shared by 8 kings each reigning 30000 years! This dynasty ended in the flood.

If this date is the same on the time line as the end of the last Ice Age, then at around 10600 BCE sea levels rose dramatically around the globe. This is recorded by many and diverse cultures;

Mesopotamia

Hinduism

Gun-Yu in China

Deucalion and Pyrrha in Ancient Greece

Genesis in the Old Testament

Bergelmir in Norse myths

Nuh (Noah) in the Quran

Polynesia

Hawaii

Mesoamerica the Mayan peoples

La Courte Oreilles Ojibwa tribe in North America

South America the Canari Confederation

Africa

Australian aboriginal tribes.

This level of ancient cultural agreement over a global flood supports the hypothesis that it occurred in large parts of the world, rather than ‘everywhere’. We are proof that most if not all of the peoples alive at that time, survived.

The Sumerain, Babylonian and Assyrian have similar flood stories to Genesis in the Bible and it is likely that the Bible referred to these for it sources. We know that the Bible was redacted in the 6th century AD so is the most recent version of events and furthest from them.

Now my version of the flood-myth story departs completely from the Bible. I take issue with the simplistic account of wild animals compliantly lining up in pairs. The majority (seven of each) of the animals were selected as food for Noah and his tribe. Therefore, I suggests that the only animals taken onboard the ark were domesticated. The Annunaki’s skill at genetic engineering was surely applied to animals as well as humans. Domesticated ‘beasts of burden’ were not just fresh meat but worked for humans, in the way humans worked for the Anunnaki.

Proof of this hypothesis? Well the reference to the animals going into the arc ‘two by two’ requires challenging. Why state this detail? Why not explain what happened to the plant, reptile, bird and insect kingdoms? There is surely a good tale to tell about those animals that did not survive, such as Unicorns. Since communities all around the world record the same event, it is likely that there were thousands of human survivors and multiple lineages of life on earth.

If we are examine the credibility the story of the Arc as a wooden ship and it’s uncontrolled travels on a tempestuous ocean, it is hard to take it literally. A boat loaded with wild carnivorous animals was always going to be an impossibility. How do you stop the animals just eating each other like they do in nature? A powerless and rudderless ship was more likely to hit a mountain top and sink, than navigate to a safe harbour.

picture credit: UCA News
The rainbow is also an arc – part of a circles circumference – the route of the Arc on the globe.

We have to ask whether the Arc could really have been a ship? Since the proportions of the Arc in the Bible are given as a cubic rectangular shape, I personally think it more likely it was a giant building, or perhaps several such buildings scattered around the globe by multiple cultures when the rains started. To flood the world would have taken several hundreds if not thousands of years, giving humans time to preserve life, as best they could. The reference to forty days in the Bible is of course numeric code in the same manner as the whole of creation taking six days.

The dimensions of the Arc are proportional to the First Temple in Jerusalem, which of course, was a building. Not only that but there is a truth in the creation of similar geometric forms at different scales, what we call today, fractals.

The Bible omits to point out that plants were as vital to preserve as animals, fungi, insects and reptiles, all of which were at risk of extinction. The Sumerian gods are repeatedly depicted in pictures as standing with flowering tree and attending to it. In one hand they hold a bag and in the other, something resembling a fir cone.

Pine cones are counter clockwise spiral forms that obey the arithmetical, Fibonacci pattern of growth. They are perfect symbols of the process of genetic engineering and / or horticultural hybridisation. The seeds are fractals of a tree / Tree of Life, in nascence, and seeds is where this hypothesis goes next.

to be continued mid May 21 on this theme and the meaning of ‘two by two’ explored to reveal something extraordinary