They are a curiosity – these domesticated animals who share life with us.
Who, for instance, turned the lions of the Savanah grasslands and the tigers of the rainforests, into pussy cats?
Certainly, this transition was complete over two or three thousand years ago for the house cat was sacred to the Ancient Egyptians as the goddess Bastet.
picture credit: Pets Magazine
The common explanation of domestication is that lions hung around nomadic hunter’s camps waiting to be thrown scraps of meat. Was their a truce between two apex predators? Did the ‘king of the jungle’ give up his throne? Really?
Similar symbiotic relationships are meant to have happened with bovines, canines, felines and other wild animals who have come to live with humans.
All of this I have focused on in a previous essay, but I came across a report by Edgar Cayce on You Tube recently that has confirmed something fascinating.
One of the most well-known psychics of the twentieth century, Edgar Cayce, maintained that this difference between wild and domesticated animals extended into the astral plane; the dimension to which souls return after bodily death. There, wild animals behave much as they did on earth as a single species consciousness – the hive mind. They do not possess individual thought but live as one.
In contrast domesticated animals and in particular ‘pets’ such as cats and dogs will have acquired some individuality during their lifetimes on earth. Traditional farmers give individual animals such as cows names, and respect their family and social groups. Farmers grow an attachment to individual animals and, in a way, become one of the bovine family.
Observers notice that the closer companion animals are emotionally integrated with humans, the more individual pets become.
Many cat and dog owners treat their furry friends as if they were human members of their family. They adopt them from birth, name them, feed them, cuddle them and grant them their free will.
picture credit: yeswarmg
In the most extreme example, some pet owners dress their pets in human clothes, although personally I think this is a step too far! The mental process of anthropomorphic projection features in epic and fanciful narratives from ancient times to today. Animals give magical support to the hero to complete an otherwise impossible quest. In the twelfth century Persia poet Farid ud-Din Attar epic fable, ‘Conference of the Birds’ it is the birds who complete an heroic journey. In our modern era Walt Disney famously brought cinema screens to life with colour, movement, music and talking animals caught up in whimsical and impossible tales.
But there is inevitably a flaw to the process of domestication and individual empowerment. Both can work backwards as well as forwards. When several family dogs form a pack, they can revert to their ‘collective’ instincts. Sadly, such domestic canines attacking humans is not uncommon.
You may be wondering where this speculation of the symbiotic partnership between humans and their pet animals is going. Well, the American clairvoyant and faith healer Edgar Cayce believed that the animal soul craves human love and companionship; a position I personally know well as a ‘mother’ of four very individual cats.
picture credit: displate.com
The ‘old crone’ archetype was the ‘witch’ in past times, and her supernatural companion was a black cat. This relationship was symbiotic, for cats have a reputation for clairvoyance. The felines spiritual purpose was, and remains, as a protector of humans from malevolent spirits and elementals. Cats are well known for staring into ’empty space’ such as high corners of rooms.
The overall process of evolution from animal spirit to human spirit, according to Edgar Cayce, is to learn three essential qualities that humans also aspire to;
Love.
Peace giving passive behaviour.
Unselfishness.
I think this idea of the purpose of domestication of ‘wild animals’ shows a deeper understanding than the modern view of bonding between human and pet being merely for mutual pleasure.
But again, this process of aspiring to higher spiritual realms for both humans and animals through their formation of deep ‘family’ and ‘familial’ bonding, has a dark side. We know that some humans on their Soul journey fail to aspire to and or achieve the above three higher self qualities. Examples of such humans in leadership roles sadly abound throughout history and today
Persons who have persistently offended social values are likely to be re-incarnated not as human but as animal. A psychic once told me that a miser, for instance, will be reincarnated as a mouse.
Sumerian tablets tell of the race of gods who lived in earth thousands of years ago known as the Anunnaki.
picture credit: theancientconnection.com
There is a clay tablet that says the Anunnaki gods brought down the domestic cat from higher realms.
In 1971, an Oxford philologist named Eleanor Ashworth found a four-thousand-year-old Sumerian tablet in a collection at Pennsylvania University. It describes a four-legged creature that ‘came down from their dwelling places in the sky’. The full description is undeniably that of a domestic cat whose purpose was to be; watching, guarding and keeping. Humans were then and now being preyed upon by malevolent spirits for their energy or as is termed today ‘lushe’. Pet cats today will follow you on walks and sit beside you in the house, not only for love, but because they are ‘on duty’.
If we can accept the notion of DNA editing by minor gods to produce domestic animals, it is worthwhile considering the evolution of homo sapien sapien and why there is a ‘missing link’ between us and our cousin Chimpanzees who share 98% of our DNA. It is an intriguing thought that humans may be self-improving souls through repeated reincarnations, in a similar way to the incarnations of loving, peaceful and unselfish domesticated animals. Were humans the also the product of genome editing; categorised by Dr. Desmond Morris as ‘naked apes’?
As humans are repeatedly reincarnated, are we not also given the task and free-will to aspire to the Divine values of love, peace and unselfishness? Are we not all on a potentially evolving towards realising our true Divine nature? Could this be the long sought ‘meaning of life’?
When there are libraries of books on religious, philosophical and spiritual knowledge, how ironic that three, two letter words may say it all.
One of the ‘philosophies’ of the highest natural wisdom is, in my view, Zen Buddhism. It is one of the few that embraces this counter intuitive notion of ‘being so’… of meals without menus.
picture credit: China Online Museum
For example, the Zen saying ‘the bamboo is both long and short’ is not trying to be obscure or ironic. It just means what it says. It introduces the idea of ‘not trying’ to be in the apparent dualistic world of contrasts. Without contrast, the dualists argue, we would have no ability to understand through discernment. In Zen this assumption of a need to understand does not exist. Why should it?
The realisation of the ‘enlightened being’ as one who has mastered the monkey mind is found in many spiritual paths. But most religions do not suggest their followers believe in emptying the mind in order to realise it’s richness. Odd paradoxes like this deny the certainty that followers of religious dogma crave.
Today, nothing is certain in theoretical physics. Quantum physics is famous for the ‘double slit experiment’ where light either has wavelike characteristics OR particle-like characteristics. This is known as the wave particle duality and was hinted at even as far back as the 17th century by the broad thinking scientist, Isaac Newton. Light has two contrasting qualities just like long and short bamboo.
picture credit: Science Forums
When our perception is based on logical possibility, we are only capable of creating a ‘reality’ that fits our personal belief system.
The world that humans inhabit is largely of their own making. Difference exists where there is a sense of general agreement in a tribe or society of how things are. It is only by realising how what we make is what we see, that perceived ‘reality’ is revealed as deeply shallow to the point of illusory.
Religions rely on prayer as a method of manifesting desired outcomes. Since these are general ‘good outcomes’ in a moral sense, the believer is optimistic that their prayers might well come about. In the event that they do, this is recorded (an in extreme cases as a miracle) while the reality of prayer is that the desired outcome rarely comes about. People often ask how a good God can let bad things happen.
The reason for this is a matter of debate but there is an alternative to the more view that prayer is a ‘wish list’. This is described by Jesus in the quotation at the end of this essay; ‘Let it be so now…’ Jesus is saying that the outcome of prayer is instantaneous. The devotee will create the desired outcome instantly a prayer is offered using creative imagination. Should you pray for yourself or others? If you desire to save your own life through prayer it might be answered straight away, but otherwise fulfilling your selfish desires will come with a price tag known as karma.
Mystics such as Jesus the Christ and Buddha knew that ‘desire’ whether in prayer or other form, is an obstacle to pure living. For instance, Gautama Buddha realised that even desire for nothing is still a desire. He abandoned his experiment with aestheticism and returned to a normal or ‘middle way.’ Only as an observer with no bias, no story, no karma, can one see impartially, all the bamboo in all of it’s variety.
This Zen concept of ‘not doing’ is difficult for modern thinkers. Throughout history people have strived to do ‘better things’ and often achieved the opposite. ‘Civilisation’ is not the linear path of continual improvement. Most civilisations eventually decline and fall. Nature exists without the centralised political control that human societies have become dependent upon.
As in Zen, the act of thinking turns out to be just as ‘out of control’ as not thinking. The space between past and future, left brain and right brain, science and art, chaos and civilisation, certainty and uncertainty, thinking and not thinking are, in my view, the perfect places for the observer to be; ‘just so’ and ‘in the now’.
‘It is so’ is not dependent on imagination (art) or calculation (science) but the counter intuitive processes and complexity that are beyond understanding. Light bends, gravity bends even time bends. We live in an Alice in Wonderland universe which obeys few of the rules we impose upon it.
The phrase “stranger and stranger” encapsulates Alice’s bewildering experiences in Wonderland, where she constantly grapples with her changing identity and the bizarre world around her. In her journey into her own mind (the rabbit hole) Alice is creating a world which is complex and unexplainable. One moment she is tall and the next short.
The late Itzhoz Bentov understood this weirdness in nature and human consciousness and believed that ‘human consciousness is not a passive observer of reality, it is an active participant in its construction – not in the poetic sense that you create you own narrative but in the real physical sense that the state of consciousness of an observer measurably interferes with the behaviour of the systems it interacts with.’
The predilection in modern societies and religions for perfection in all things, are dangerous because the ‘control’ and ‘certainty’ (for instance in the development of Artificial Intelligence) is uncertain. Expectations are imaginary, appearing on our social media streams as ‘fake’ or ‘real’ by the power of computer-generated imagery and speech.
Perhaps this present time is now ripe for a new form of consciousness, not based on entitled expectations but on the realisation that ‘it’ already is so, and when it is not our thoughts can and will always make ‘it be so’ in an instant.
John 3:3, where Jesus tells Nicodemus, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again.”
Few who read this quotation interpret it literally. Although we know that life consists of birth followed by death, Biblical scholars and church leaders believe that humans die and then are re-born during a one and only lifetime.
If you asked a child what Jesus the Christ meant in John 3.3 the answer would be, ‘to know God I have to die and be born again.’
This literal meaning is obvious, especially those of another faith such as Hinduism and Buddhism where re-incarnation is central to self-improvement.
The metaphor I use to illustrate reincarnation is from nature because nature always improves itself. The theory of natural selection by Charles Darwin shocked 19C Christians. Yet today most accept that our DNA is a vehicle for improving the species over consecutive generations. Lessons learnt by plants and animals are integrated and the species improves. The birth life cycle is vital to natural evolution.
This logical model also applies to humans in my view. When we die, nature would never let our energy bodies fade away and with it a lifetime’s learning. It makes sense that our energetic self which is multi-dimensional and eternal will return to the physical dimension to learn lessons that can only be experienced here.
As an example of how this learning programme operates, Carl G. Jung identified the twelve archetypal character types.
picture credit: Andrew Folts – Medium
These twelve characteristics are wired into our individual psychological makeup in varying degrees but with one dominant. A ‘Regular’ personality for instance will be dependable and conservative in nature but lacking in an adventurous spirit. When nature sends this soul back again to earth, it will have an opportunity to work up this weakness. So, a Regular might be reborn as an Explorer to live a less structured and more adventurous life. No one personality type is better than another; we must become masters of them all. This process of ‘correction’ works over multiple re-incarnations.
Eventually and perhaps after thousands of years, a human being will accomplish perfect inner balance and find ‘the Kingdom of God’ within. This explanation is only one perspective on the re-incarnation process. A less psychological model in my view is more relevant to today.
We live in a time when human evolution is rapidly changing. We see change in nature such as climate change but also technological innovation and it is hard for nature and humans to adapt.
One more subtle aspect of this change that I have observed in myself and collectively is a move from brain centred consciousness to heart centred wisdom. Humans are not becoming more emotional because they have always had emotions. The transition is more an unpeeling and inner revelation of hidden emotional truths.
Again, I would argue that this journey through the spectrum of human emotions is made complete through re-incarnation. The sometimes-sheltered lives of the past have not enabled people to experience in depth the full range of human feeling in one lifetime. A medieval farmer will never have left their own village and certainly not felt the fear of the extinction of life on the planet, whereas, since the atom bomb was invented the potential for planet Earth to be laid waste is ever present. To know death is that close is humbling.
At a more personal level I am going to express an insight that you are unlikely to find in a library or on the internet.
Have you ever wondered why siblings fight each other? I acknowledge that there are many brother and sister relationships, particularly with twins and triplets, who co-operate in loving ways with each other.
On the other hand, and quite frequently, siblings fight even from an early age. Young parents are distraught at how regularly their much loved ‘little angels’ fight each other viciously over inconsequential things.
Mystical and gnostic traditions describe souls that are not incarnate, being able to choose the family into which they will be born, including the time and location on earth.
picture credit: HubPages
The idea that came to me is that such souls may choose to be re-born with their enemies from a previous lifetime. The word ‘enemy’ is emotionally explosive but really is meant to represent the process of seeing the world from another point of view and not being able to respect another’s view, known today as ‘confirmation bias’.
Matthew 5:44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven.
When we die, a person’s life is replayed from another person’s point of view. For instance, you may have to feel how your mother felt about something you did or didn’t do, or a how a partner felt when you said this. It is not a series of judgements but a lesson in feeling and empathy; cause and effect.
Stories and narratives gain worth and value when conflict is introduced. A good book or film only comes alive when the villain appears. Life is intended to be like Tolstoy’s epic novel War and Peace. A single lifetime can be a maelstrom of emotions which are important lessons not experienced or not mastered in previous incarnations.
So it is in my view that family life is not a promise of a smooth ride. From an early age there will be family conflicts and ‘rows’ which churn emotions deeply.
We live in this time of similar upheaval on a global scale. It is not a period of mental change so much as a period of emotional development. The Aquarian age is represented by waves in water. This is a powerful metaphor, for we know how terrifying a storm at sea can make us feel even if we are only watching it from a distance. Then at other times the sea is calm, and we love to immerse ourselves in the soothing and supporting water.
With negative emotions such as angry and hatred appearing in world politics and the same old family issues alike, is this not a time for us to search within ourselves for the point of inner calm and detachment? At this threshold in the evolution of souls most of us have had an opportunity to be detached from the ‘ups and downs’ of life on Earth ever present before us.
We may have learnt the eternal value of Christ’s instruction to ‘love your enemy’. Earth is not a pleasure garden although it can be. It is an opportunity to become one with yourself and others and in doing so, realising ‘the Kingdom of God’.
The fourth tenet of Darwin’s theory of natural selection;
Survival is not random.
Individuals whose traits happen to fit their environment better are more likely to survive, reproduce, and pass those traits along. Over time, helpful traits become more common in the population while harmful one’s fade.
To see a world in a grain of sand, Heaven in a wild flower19th century poet, William Blake
There is a great deception present in the lives of human beings. We cannot imagine consciousness outside of our own heads. Perhaps the emergence of Artificial General Intelligence is beginning to suggest that this can be the case. We shall see.
In Ancient Egypt and Ancient Greece and Rome, consciousness was understood to naturally inhabit matter. Matter was then defined as the four elements of earth, air, fire and water. Spirit was the fifth element and the one that gave ‘life’ and made all things (mineral, vegetable and animal) feel alive – conscious.
Arthena Parthenos note the elmentalpicture Wikipedia
In ancient religions, priests would invite spirit to occupy statues made in the form of a human or animal body. If the spirit had archetypal characteristics of both animal and human bodies this was represented such as Thoth and Anubis in ancient Egypt.
For the Greeks and Romans, a statue in a temple or a home shrine was a means of communication with a living god. This was not only vital for daily life but for personal continuity into the afterlife.
In ancient Japan, the religion of Shinto took a simpler animistic relationship with nature. This deep reverence for the natural world is reflected in traditional Japanese arts and crafts. The practice of ‘wood bathing’ in Japan today, is a modern manifestation of becoming deeply energised by the spirit of woodland and individual trees.
The ancient Celts in Western Europe manipulate the invisible energies of the landscape. They controlled them by moving earth and stones to sympathetically increase the power of the ‘earth spirit’. The animals, vegetables and minerals benefited from this bio-electromagnetic energy. Humans in particular rode the energy like a wave in the initiation chambers built into their long barrows and dolmens.
New Grange Ireland Initiation Chambers and Pictograms picture credit: Sky History
In north America the first nation tribes held nature in the high respect that one gives one’s grandmother. They called her Unci Maka and revered the landscape as if it were their own grandmother’s body.
“Every part of this soil is sacred in the estimation of my people. Every hillside, every valley, every plain and grove, has been hallowed by some sad or happy event of days long vanished. Even the rocks, which seem to be dumb and dead as they swelter in the sun along the silent shore, thrill with memories of stirring events connected with the lives of my people, and the very dust upon which you now stand responds more lovingly to their footsteps than yours, because it is rich with the blood of our ancestors, and our bare feet are conscious of the sympathetic touch.”
Sadly, the industrial revolution and the ‘religion’ of scientific materialism turned its back on animistic spirit traditions. People in industrialising countries left the land of their ancestors for what William Blake called ‘dark Satanic mills’. At least fifty per cent of the world’s population today live in cities.
picture credit: Dudley Port etching 1909-by-joseph-pennell – Word Histories website
Nineteenth century scientists such as Sir Isaac Newton reduced the understanding of nature to a series of cause-and-effect mechanisms or ‘natural laws’. It is less well known that he was also open to the possibility that there are more mysteries than conclusions. He studied the ancient art of Alchemy and the Torah for the greater part of his life. Society embraced his scientific discoveries and ignored his spiritual search.
Today, scientists know that matter and energy cannot be reduced to a few laws. The picture is more complex. As in the study of the human body, there is not only anatomy, but physiology – what things are and how they work.
The ‘wood wide web’ describes how tree roots and fungi connect to share information, nutrients, and moisture.
picture credit: Parvati Records Band Camp
In the parallel worlds of nature spirits; fairies, elves, goblins, water spirits and the rest, have always been described as living in communities, not isolation. They mirror organic organisational truths that require co-operation in order to provide the resilience to loss through adversity. A new by-pass has little regard for the unseen.
Nature never discards anything as worthless. In physics, energy is not lost, only turned into another type of energy. Matter will similarly ‘change state’ from solid to gas and never be lost.
It is so in the municipal allotment where sunlight is absorbed by vegetables the remains of which eventually break down into humus for future crops. There is a circular pattern of renewal which today is respected as ‘sustainable’. Nature achieves it without effort, but modern societies struggle to achieve without loss of ‘convenience and comfort’. Even human consciousness is recycled under the same principle and occupies many organic bodies in it’s learning and initiation journeys using the power of physical reality.
Nature will always provide spiritual and physical nourishment for human beings. However, the supply of the latter is not infinite for the obvious reason that there is only one ‘Grandmother Earth’. Therefore, as the size of the human population seriously threatens the vast eco-systems of the planet either population or ‘standard of living’ or both, must reduce.
picture credit: International Institute for Sustainable Development
This fact is painful to industrialists and those who benefit from the draining effects on the planet of mass production. As materialist can not conceive of or carry out a solution to the damaged Earth in material terms, space exploration is posited as a way to ‘get more stuff’ even when planets are known to be distant wastelands.
Human populations have already thrived at a sustainable and advanced material standard of living throughout history and around the world. What gave people purpose and comfort was a universal enjoyment of spirit and human consciousness. The extraordinarily high standards of ancient artists, sculptors, musicians and engineers and architects contrasts with modern creations devoid of pulse.
If one challenges what spirit is and what benefits it brings then that is another subject. Suffice to say that the urge to follow a ‘religion’ as a step to a non-material spiritual path is one that is found in even the most so called ‘primitive’ societies.
Curious and disillusioned souls who have been immersed in modern city life travel to hidden pockets of the Amazon rainforest to learn and experience a living spirit world from traditional indigenous shaman and healers through the drug Ayahuasca.
The journey into nature becomes a journey into the hidden areas of oneself and nature is realised as the perfect teacher for that. The religious dogmas of the past are today seen by many as trees that bear no fruit only promises of future fruit.
When William Blake wrote poetry and painted pictures describing his mystical vision and path, society was open to his ideas even if they did not understand. I would argue that this intuitive leap into unknown possibility is required again today so that a complete change of direction for humanity can be achieved.
There is an idea and possible reality of a ‘new earth’ revealing itself at this present time. It is not the planet of old, nor the ideas of our ancestors. It is an escape from a cocoon that is no longer comfortable or at least, no longer sustainable.
Leaving the safety of a cocoon and growing angelic wings; that is a move into the unknown accomplished by butterflies every day.
picture credit: Pinterest
“All things are alive and have their own language, vibrations and luminosity that you can feel with you psychic body.”
Kyriacos C. Markides “The Magus of Strovolos” page 99 Penguin Books
Whatever language you happen to speak, words are a blessing and a curse.
Humans have a brain that uses an operating system based on words. Most people do not think in ones and zeros although surely some do. But even they are converting code into words and thought.
So how could words be curse? Surely, they are a great liberation for the mind whether in the arts or sciences? Well, the odd thing about words is that they are constructed using an alphabet of not very many letters around 25 depending on your language. The Arabic abjad for instance uses 28 letters and the Hebrew alphabet, 22. The creative brilliance of an alphabet-based language comes from the astronomical permutations derived from such a relatively small number of letters.
This almost infinite number of permutations to create words is the blessing they give to language. The curse is that human thoughts only use a small fraction of these permutations because their thoughts are limited. Let us hold that idea of ‘limited thinking’ and examine how easy it is to create new words, and I shall use English as an example but no doubt the same principle applies in other Indo-European languages.
Take a simple combination of three letters…ONE and how it is used to make a variety of four-letter words in English.
I shall suffix each letter of the alphabet (less vowels) in this experiment.
B…bone
C…cone
D…done
So far so good. These three are common words, but next comes a word that has no meaning.
f…fone
to continue…
g…gone
h…hone
j…jone
k…kone
l…lone
m…mone
n…none
p…pone
q…qone
v…vone
s…sone
t…tone
v…vone
w…wone
x…xone
y…yone
z…zone
Out of these total of 22 examples only 9 have established meanings! There are 13 simple new four-letter words waiting for a meaning to be attached to them!
From this exercise we can extrapolate the entire English Dictionary as being a fraction of the total available words.
From this we can see that language does not limit our thoughts. There are plenty of words. What we are short of are meanings to attach to words.
The curse of language is when words control and limit imagination. If you invent new words no one is going to understand you. A language that does not constantly expand and reinvent itself creates boundaries over which only creative writers and in particular poets, imagine new ideas. But if your innovation make no sense then it is assumed, your mind has gone.
As the boundaries for new words are almost infinite, the limitation is the direction in which our thoughts extend.
We are like trees clinging to a rock with our roots. To remain upright we must limit our grasp on reality…we must not ‘go too far’.
This is the curse of language. The structure which enables mental exploration is also a limitation of thought.
Art by a child under two years of age
The mind of newborn child has no such limitation through language. It must learn a thousand new things every day for months, even years before it begins to understand the meanings of words. Interestingly, an infant’s brain can learn any human language, however obscure it may be.
Our brain cells and their almost infinite connections are not a limiting factor to thought but only become so through life.
If a person is not adventurous in their thoughts, they can calcify and express no more than the same ideas repeatedly. Perhaps you know some people like that. A common term for them is a ‘bore’.
There are indeed, in the words of the old aphorism, ‘no dull subjects only dull minds.’
It is interesting to observe how the process of shopping has changed over the decades and wonder how this will evolve within the current rush by large corporations to replace humans with Artificial General Intelligence.
For hundreds of years people bought and sold produce in street markets. The social interaction in this daily event provided fresh wholesome local produce at prices that most people could afford including by barter.
If one were to score this system for its social interaction and satisfaction, I would give it 10 out of 10.
My grandfather was a Victorian and worked in a food emporium in England. The shop assistants stood between the merchandise stacked on shelves and the counter. Customers approached the counter and described what they wanted to the assistant. The food was either processed and weighed on the counter or handed to them in exchanged for payment.
If one were to score this system for its social interaction and satisfaction, I would give it 8 out of 10.
The method of the exchange of goods changed in a revolutionary way in the 1960’s American style ‘supermarket’.
The counter was removed and customers were free to select items from the shelves. They had to place items in a wire basket that they carried to a ‘check out’ for an exchange of money to take place between customer and a friendly check out operator.
If one were to score this system for its social interaction and satisfaction, I would give it 6 out of 10.
(NOTE the ‘rationed soap’ in post war Britain and the lack of fresh produce.)
There has since been a move to eliminate the need for the shop to have check out tills. They are being replaced by areas in which the customer completes the whole process of pricing their selected goods, packing and completing payment. No employees for the food companies means higher profit.
picture credit: Waterford Whispers News
If one were to score this system for its social interaction and satisfaction, I would give it 4 out of 10.
Today the process of the customer leaving home to go shopping is being reduced and perhaps will eventually not happen at all. Instead, goods are selected and paid for virtually online and delivered by human or robot to the customer’s front door. No expensive shops for the food companies means more profit.
picture credit; Efulfillment Service
If one were to score this system for its social interaction and satisfaction, I would give it 2 out of 10.
This is a brief view of shopping as a social science until the present day. Each ‘innovation’ and ‘advancement’ has been conducted principally to boost profits for the company at the expense of customer’s social interaction and satisfaction. One wonders what will happen next? Will it be a search for more profit or something more sinister?
In my view, life in the future will almost certainly involve Artificial General Intelligence which thankfully has not been matched by human general intelligence, yet. When it does, I expect governments around the world will use the distribution of goods to private customers as a process of exchange not for money, but obedience.
The model of ‘lock downs’ was developed in the ‘pandemic’ of 2020 for what has turned out to be of doubtful benefit. Citizens in countries of all political persuasions were expected to stay at home and not complain. Food, water and medicines could be obtained but movement in public places was surveyed and strictly policed on the grounds of ‘public safety’.
picture credit: VOA
The advantage for governments of this system is that the principal of citizens being free to do what they want, is disallowed. People will not be permitted to consume the quantity and quality of food they can afford, as today. Instead, customers will be told that they can only have what is available. Vital services and goods will be shared out in this way, based on availability rather than need. Various ‘plausible’ reasons will be given for the unavailability of food and groceries such as energy and fertiliser shortages (caused mainly by sinister or negligent and reckless government policies, such as not supporting farmers).
As happened in the Democratic Republic of China during the pandemic, mobile phone apps enable governments to control people; such as free movement to work and shops. This system might easily extend tomorrow into rationing of goods and services for ‘the common good’ and ‘safety’ and ‘unavoidable shortages’ etc.
If one were to score this system for its social interaction and satisfaction, I would give it 0 out of 10.
However, hackers using spybots and malware purchased from the dark web, can be expected to try to outsmart the government smartphone apps. As in all closed systems of exchange, there will emerge a black market. At certain times and places, people will be able to meet pop-up traders selling wholesome local products such as organic chicken eggs, grains and vegetables. Neither AGI nor governments will know anything about it.
The wheel will have turned full circle.
If one were to score this system for its social interaction and satisfaction, I would give it 10 out of 10.
There are simultaneous galactic games of chess in progress between black and white. These games are happening simultaneously on multiple levels with many participants. A move on one board affects another game in unseen ways.
On 1st April 2026 NASA launched a rocket named Orion as part of the Artemis II Mission to send humans to the moon and back. This is happening at the same time as the Zionist government of Israel and the United States government are conducting an undeclared illegal war against Iran, Russia is continuing to pummel Ukraine and China has it’s eyes on Taiwan.
Which of these has the world’s attention? It’s probably all of these but the Artemis II misdirection has certainly captured the attention of many. Everyone likes space rockets.
In a chess game on another level, rockets have another significance. They can be seen as a torch, a cylinder which produces light and flame. This has always fascinated humans for it is the oldest of all technologies; fire. The Statue of Liberty on Liberty Island, New York is of course holding a torch as a symbolic beacon. It was intended to guide travellers to a place where individual freewill flourishes. A torch is also symbol of light and enlightenment as in the ancient Olympic Games.
The Winter Olympic Games 2026 picture credit The Independent
A rocket belches out fire from below, not above like a torch. The rockets of space exploration and war are inverted torches of freedom and as a rule ‘turning upside down’ represents Satanic forces at work.
The Pentagon in Washington is perhaps one of the most infamous sources of power, along with the secret societies.
But some occultists work in plain sight and leave clues. The Orion rocket is 322 feet tall, which is the number of the Yale secret society, the Skull and Crossed Bones. This is not a club. It has members in powerful places including past Presidents Howard Taft and the Bushes, Senior, and Junior. ‘Bonesmen’ are sworn to secrecy. Perhaps the crossed bones references the symbol ‘X’ of Elon Musk’s social media platform and SpaceX programme?
Esoteric ‘programmes’ are time critical, as the spell must be performed on the right day on the annual calendar and hour of the day. The launch of the Orion rocket in the Artemis11 programme was originally 26th March 2026. This is a significant date in the Wiccan calendar and is a few days after OSTARA or the spring equinox. Note the word o-STAR-a or Easter. It is significant because it is the midpoint between Inbolc and Beltane or Candlemas and Mayday. It marks when there are equal amounts of light and darkness in the day and when the solar activity begins to ascend until the summer solstice.
At the time of Ostara we feel the powerful energy of nature rising and nature starting a new solar year…as 1st April was once, before being moved by Pope Gregory XIII to the first of January. April is a time of balance, two sides of a central point as in the three stars of ‘Orion’s belt’. To return to Earth on 11th April is to pass between two pillars or a gate II. As the spacecraft is called Orion could this be intended to represent Orion’s Gate, an ancient cosmic gateway through which souls journeyed to attain higher wisdom?
The launch was postponed for we are told, technical reasons until 1st April at 6.35pm Eastern Time or 11.35pm BST. This coincides precisely with the Jewish Passover which happened this year between the evening of 1st April and 9th April. The story of Passover in Exodus describes how God ordered Moses to tell the Israelites to slaughter a lamb and mark their doorframes with it’s blood and then eat unleavened bread for seven days. This informed the ‘destroying angel’ to pass over that particular household. Is humanity being warned of another plague or destruction?
In 1972, Apollo 17 landed humans on the surface of the moon for the first time. The logo for the Apollo programme curiously features the constellation Orion. The S shape curve creates an uncanny resemblance to the Yin / Yang symbol of the east, which symbolises the balance of nature and a non-binary philosophy where male and female are complimentary, not opposite.
picture credit: FlatEarth.wspicture credit: NASA
The gods Orion and Artemis were male and female archetypal hunters. If you wonder why the Apollo lunar programme was named after a sun god, perhaps it is because Artemis has a twin brother named after ‘the light of the world’… Apollo. His myth narrates that he challenged Artemis to shoot an arrow at an object in the sea which unbeknown to her, was Orion’s head. In his memory she fixed Orion in the stars as the constellation we see today.
We might question the use of ancient Greek and Roman names by a scientific establishment such as NASA. The West embraces scientific materialism as a philosophy of life. Excursions away from material centred ideas are unexpected. A large number of the constellations were named as mythical gods and creatures by the Greek astronomer Ptolemy. In the 18th and 19th centuries some were named after scientific instruments. There is evidence that this practice started in the Middle Ages with the astrolabe. Does this represent a conflict between the opposing world views of archetypal symbols and materialism?
Clearly the ancient understanding of astronomy and magic has been overshadowed but occultists and Freemasons have retained this ancient knowledge of symbols even as scientific materialism took over.
At the foundation of NASA there are two influential figures who understood and used the power of symbols and ritual.
The first was Jack Parsons who in the 1930’s set up the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and developed the rocket technology in use even today. He achieved this with no formal education.
Parsons had a deep interest in the Occult and Satanism and was a one-time follower of the famous British Occultist ‘The Beast 666’, also known as Alastair Crowley. Parsons was a friend of the founder of the church of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard as they shared an interest in the occult. Note the similarity between the above NASA Apollo (above) and Artemis (below) logos and the European Scientology logo; the S shape over or through pyramids in a universal circle. The circle of stars on a blue background is a clear reference to Europa.
There is a resemblance between the words Satan and Saturn suggesting a poetic connection. Satan is the force that holds humans in the material world until Saturn as ‘Old Father Time’ sweeps his scythe. He is the Titan Chronos or ‘time’. Saturn is alchemically the metal lead and we feel this sometimes as gravity. In space, crews temporarily escape Earth’s the tyranny the ‘lead boots’ feel of a material human body. As astronauts theoretically reach almost the speed of light time, slows down and in theory stops.
The second important figure in NASA’s creation was the Nazi rocket scientist Werner von Braun. He designed the rocket used in the Apollo programme named appropriately the Saturn V rocket. When the second world war ended in 1945 he went to the USA with other prominent German scientists in a programme named Operation Paperclip. The Nazi regime had been sending untargeted V2 rockets to London and other cities. There is evidence that the Germans also had advanced technology including anti-gravity spacecraft. This was eagerly seized by the Allied countries after the fall of the Reich and led to the ‘space race’ in the following years, including the ‘Star Wars’ programme under the Ronald Regan administration and the Strategic Arms Agreements.
picture credit: NexusNewsfeed.com
It’s like going on holiday and longing for home.
In another game of chess, the ‘torch bearer’ or Lucifer, is an angel who was cast out of heaven by the Almighty for daring to challenge His absolute power. The Bible conflates Lucifer with Satan but the two are not the same. There are twin stories of a battle between a sun god and a serpent monster, Satan and Lucifer. The former is a Saturn external world snake and the latter an internal world, Venus snake. The Venus snake has a tricky quality represented on the chess board by the knight’s move. It is the unreal and unexpected; the trigger of unintended consequences.
We see numerous connections with Earth’s beautiful sister planet, Venus. The symbol V (for Venus) keeps appearing on the mission logos and the Saturn V rocket. Artemis in all her glory appears to humans as the morning or evening star Venus at different times in the year. The V shape may also be the set square of the Freemasons or when inverted, a pair of compasses.
The United States of America was founded by Freemasons such as George Washington in 1876 and it’s 250th anniversary is in 2026. The freemason’s understood symbolism and it’s power in ritual to express and manage the forces of light and darkness
As a general point, there appears to me a present-day schism between the material and the non-material worlds, of matter and energy. Humanity is being torn apart by the (Satanic) process of craving comfortable, material lifestyles that Earth can no longer sustain. In New Age philosophy and in the Dolores Canon canon, sensitive souls are presently leaving the material planet for a ‘new Earth’, or in the metaphor of this essay, ‘chess in another dimension’.
We cannot deny that strange coincidences can be found in NASA’s evolving story that link it to the hidden and unexplained. One of NASA’s best known astronauts in Apollo 11 was Buzz Aldrin. He happened to be a Scottish Rite 33rd degree Freemason. He was the second man on the moon after Neil Armstrong, and he followed that ‘giant leap for mankind’ onto the silver surface of the moon where he conducted a masonic ritual and founded a Lunar Lodge.
Today’s high priests of technology and private and commercial space programmes are Elon Musk with Starship designed by SpaceX and Jeff Bezos with Blue Origin.
Both are not apparently concerned with sustaining a reasonable standard of living for bodies and souls currently on planet earth. When Musk oversaw the U.S. Department for Government Efficiency, one of his costs cutting measures was to reduce funding of USAid by 90%.
There has appeared in human society around the world a group who are referred to as the ‘one per cent’. They are extraordinarily wealthy and appear to have little compassion for others less fortunate, mirroring the Court of King Louis XIV, self-styled sun King who built an opulent palace in Versailles whilst his subjects starved. This apparent disdain for life and the common good has been a hall mark of the line of the Frankish Merovingian royal bloodline. It is present in the anti-human rights and freedom policies of a growing number of right wing politicians around the world today.
The emergence of the power of rockets as agents of exploration and destruction, in my view represents the last gasp of male energy that has unbalanced the progress of humanity for thousands of years. What we see in the growing Aquarian Age is a blooming presence of a feminine energy; softer and more compassionate.
Apollo’s sister Artemis, embodies this femininity. It is a difficult balance needed between red and blue which, in my view, has been historically suppressed by male leaders. The death of the late Princess Diana (the roman name for Artemis) was a sad loss for humanity. ‘Death without mercy’ is typical of the ancient Merovingian bloodline energy. Under the Pont d’Alma where Diana died is a replica of the flaming torch from the Statue of Liberty. One of Diana’s aims in this world, was to remove the deadly remnants of war – land mines – a perfect example of light extinguishing darkness.
picture credit: NASA
The five parts of the symbol of the Artemis II mission, feature an inverted capital A as in to the Apollo mission logo. Interestingly the central bar of the letter A has been removed so what is shown is an inverted V. The last of five Artemis missions to the moon will be Artemis V. As well as a ‘loving’ Venus reference, in numerology the number 5 represents balance and harmony so an inverted V suggests a disharmony. In the Artemis logo left, the V stands over the north pole of an unsmiling blue arc represents the planet Earth. Through the pyramid curves a red line suggesting that if this unhappy Earth is feminine, the S shaped curve is masculine but they no longer balance as in the Apollo logo above. The red line connects with a white sphere representing the moon which is half eclipsed by the top of the pyramid. If you look carefully, you will see a white line eclipsing the left side of the letter R. Red, white and blue? Liberty, Equality, Fraternity? Who knows. Perhaps May Day 2026 is a time for revolution.
Artemis I was launched without a crew, understandably for safety reasons but possibly also to prove that for scientific study, a crew is not needed. Just sending one jar of Nutella one astronauts luxury, is costing tens of thousands of dollars. There are many other obvious advantages to unmanned scientific missions. Scientists in the 1970’s wanted the Apollo missions to be unmanned but politics of the day demanded maned missions. The decision to send a three man and one-woman crew in Artemis II suggests a political motive again. Two men and two women astronauts would have been a better balance!
This theme of the two extremes represented by male and female, light and darkness, extends over the chequer board of space time. Personally, I hope mankind never reaches the exhausted masculine planet of war Mars, and instead learns from the feminine lunar missions that planets eventually degrade into Wastelands if not sustained by love. The reflections of astronauts from this and previous missions describe how inspirational the view of Earth is from far away.
picture credit: Domestic Violence Co-ordinating Council / Delaware / USA
Is it wrong for a victim to commit a crime against their abuser?
Consider a wife who has suffered various kinds of abuse over many years from her husband. One day she picks up a kitchen knife and stabs him to death. You have seen this story in movies and books many times and one is always split between compassion for the victim and condemnation of their crime of murder.
Most courts would find the wife guilty of murder. Her defence of ‘self-defence’ or ‘after years of abuse’, would be considered as mitigating circumstances and might reduce the sentence significantly.
When children fight they will commonly defend themselves with an accusation; ‘so and so started it.’
They might have been a peaceable victim who was attacked by a bully. In most ethical standards and laws, a violent act permits self defence by the victim. If the bully claimed to have attacked in order to prevent being attacked this is unlikely be regarded as permissible unless the victim had made to strike and the bully blocked the attack before striking back. Children can confuse adults with this simple excuse or ‘defence’ for violence and so do modern leaders!
The abused wife who retaliates in anger is like a country that has suffered abuse from a neighbouring state for many years. If brought to breaking point, the victim state will decide it has had enough of violent attacks and incursions onto their land. They will strike back. The question is, did the victim start the violence by objecting to abuse? Who ‘started it’ becomes almost impossible to define as the origin of the violence and the definition of the first act of violence is difficult to pin point. It probably wasn’t a single agressive act but multiple acts of passive aggression by either party.
picture credit: Communitycommons.org
In the eighteenth century, the United States of America slowly dispossessed and committed murder and land theft against the indigenous population as had done other European colonisers before them.
The State of Israel was created by occupying Colonial powers in 1945 from which point onwards to the present day, Israel land stole land from and murdered anyone who was in the way.
Are not both of these examples of the ‘wife-beating husband’ and a continuous ‘they started it’ mentality? How much provocation should original and entitled inhabitants suffer before fighting invaders?
Today the Zionist government in Israel is trying to persuade the world that those who fight back against the genocide of Palestinians, are ‘terrorists’.
Over the decades the words ‘Jewish’ and ‘anti-Semite’ have become used as if by an innocent abused wife. It is certainly a fact that Jewish people have had a hard time through out modern and ancient history. They have been the victims of violent and non-violent abuse in many countries culminating in their attempted genocide by the National Socialist government of Germany in the early 20th century.
picture credit: BBC
When the Zionist government uses the defence today of ‘he started it’, the first question is when it started (certainly not on October 7th 2021) and how to reach a peaceful conclusion for this unhappy hostorical marriage of Jews and Palestinians.
The child in the playground who shouts ‘he started it’ does not realise that there are almost always passive options to violence, even if it is public humiliation or martydom. The Christians will tell you stories about this of their ‘turn the other cheek’ Messiah being murdered by the Jews of that time.
The Zionist government of Israel and the United States of America defend their invasions of Arab states over the last few decades by claiming that they are the innocent victims of ‘terrorism’. But who are the true terrorists?
picture credit: Ryttch Magazine
A short detour to examine the word ‘terrorism’ is required. All violence creates fear in the victim but is this terrorism? The term is defined as;
‘…the calculated use of violence, or threat of violence, against civilians or non-combatants to induce fear and coerce governments or societies to achieve political, religious, or ideological goals.’
This is a definition according to AI; so open that it also clearly defines ‘war’ in it’s modern form, with civilians victims rather than military targets. Therefore I believe that ‘terrorism’ is more than this definition. It omits to define who is using this violence against civilians? Is it a nation’s armed forces or a small group of political extremists such as the IRA or ETA in the twentieth century?
Today nation states are deploying their armed forces for extreme ideological goals outside of the international laws of War. By any definition, abandoning law is unlawful and therefore this is terrorism.
As we are examining words used in war, let us consider the difference between ‘killing’ and ‘murder’. You will often hear news reports that civilians have been ‘killed’ by missiles but is this more accurately ‘murder’?
We are told that modern drones and missiles can hit targets with laser accuracy. And yet, photographs of Gaza today are almost identical to photographs of cities ‘carpet bombed’ in WW II.
So if a missile lands on a school or hospital killing civilians, is this a ‘mass murder’ or a ‘mass killing’ – verbally sanitised as ‘collateral damage’? There is clearly a legal question of whether the missile was intended to be launched and targetted so as to cause loss of innocent life.
A soldier killing an enemy soldier is lawful because each expect to fight each other to death but civilians have no such expectation.
Today countries such as the USA and Israel will argue that they do not respect International Law and Courts of Justice as a sort of ‘get out’ clause. Time will be the judge of this but history suggests they will need good lawyers.
Nuremberg Trials after World War Two
Murdering innocent people should not be a subject for debate in countries that consider themselves ‘civilised’ but today leaders use words in such a way that they feel they can justify the most heinous crimes against humanity, by merely changing definitions. Trump has not declared war against Iran and his missiles and invading troops are a ‘military operation’. As there is ‘no war’ he argues that he does not need Congress to approve going to war on behalf of the people of the United States.
In my view, we all have a responsibility to understand not only what we are told but how we are being told it. Using language to alter truth exists in every language but our primary responsibility must surely be to not to manipulate language for
unholy ends.
You can quote me on this…when we do not stand up; we lie.
If Democracy were a mental disorder each, and every country could be diagnosed as to where on the democracy spectrum their governmental policies lie. There are some countries who pay lip service to democratic rules and some who follow procedures to the letter. In between are the majority of countries and it’s a mix.
Democracy rules largely in the West, plus countries historically colonised by the West, and informs western self image that it’s political ways are superior to the rest of the world.
It is not easy to view objectively how this form of government operates in Europe and the United States of America. For instance in modern day Switzerland, the most important political decisions are decided directly by citizens through referendums. These may take place several times a year, swiftly and efficiently without fuss or interference. Citizens feel empowered because they are being included in important ‘course corrections’ of government. There is no pressure on a government to follow a manifesto on which they were elected; an expectation that fails to understand that sometimes the super tanker needs to change speed and direction when an iceberg moves into it’s path.
The ancient Greeks were of course the originators of ‘government by the people for the people’. The Platonic City was restricted in size by the number of citizens in a circular crowd who could hear an orator in their midst; a number calculated exactly to 5040.
Plato’s City picture credit: The Saturday Paper
This is called Direct Democracy, enabling individuals direct connection with those with the power to decide policy and law. In many ways it makes the most sense as each citizen has at least 1/5040 th influence on the destiny of their city state. In this way their loyalty to their nation would be expected to be very strong. They after all, are partly responsible for the consequences of the flaws and laws that effect their lives.
What inevitably usurped this system was the increase in the size of city States.
With increasing populations in large urbanisations, the Romans in particular gave citizens the right to vote for someone to represent their views, a Senator.
This is better in theory than in practice, for having given away their power to a third party, every citizen becomes disconnected to government. Senators may decide or be corrupted or bribed so as not to represent the views of those who elected them.
What contributed to the eventual downfall of the Western and Eastern Roman Empires were the Caesar’s who assumed control of all the power of the state, dictators. As well as fiddling the taxes and trade, Nero fiddled as Rome went up in flames.
At this point power has been completely removed from the influence of the general population and assumed by an individual acting in self interest, not the interest of the country and it’s citizens.
Again we have seen the rise of such dictators in governments in Western Europe and the United States of America in modern times.
Charlie Chaplin’s Comedy of Terrors
So at the ‘dictator’ end of the democratic spectrum, there is no government of the people by the people. Politics has been reduced to one personality and a carefully vetted ‘hangers on’ who are absolutely loyal to the dictator.
These may be civilians who have gained power through wealth and influence in areas other than politics. Clearly this does not suit them in any way to a career in politics but that does not stop them for the reasons that entrepreneurs are natural risk takers and self believers. Failure in policy is unlikely to affect their lifestyle and they do not feel responsible for the well being of others, so they advise and influence in politics through a process of making mistakes.
The United States of America and the United Nations have a policy known as Democracy and Governance. The intention is to bring democracy to the countries of the world under autocratic rule. For the USA the Middle Eastern countries have been high on the list for DG transformation because of the natural resources and geographical location of countries such as Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Oman, Saudi Arabia and others.
One of the first wars with Arab countries between the USA proxy in the region, Israel, was the Arab Israeli wars in 1948 and 1967.
The problem with promoting democracy in it’s many forms in the Middle Eastern Arab countries is cultural difference. Whilst the West may not like or approve of autocratic military leaders such as one time Libyan leader Muammar Ghaddafi or past Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, life without unpleasant self styled ‘revolutionary’ leaders like them has proved far worse for the citizens of those countries.
It is likely that the present ‘regime change’ in Iran will have similar unintended consequences for the ordinary citizens of Iran.
The consequences of ‘regime change’ in the United States of America at this time are impossible to predict. The once dependable institutions were intended benignly, to protect the constitutional rights of the individual citizen. These rights have slowly usurped democratic institutions set up to prevent autocratic rule, such as Supreme Court.
I write this with a partly wry smile knowing what comes next as far as democracy and freedom is concerned, in any country anywhere in the world. The future is already in the news in a story about a company called Anthropic.
Anthropic is described as a ‘safety and research company that’s working to build reliable, interpretable and steerable AI systems.’
It is currently in dispute with the government of the United States of America which wants full access to it’s systems for use in warfare without control by humans. Anthropic is refusing on grounds of this being unlawful and morally indefensible.
For as any child will tell you, a robot that has supreme power over humans is a bad idea. The 2004 film ‘I Robot’ was science fiction twenty years ago and reality today, if you call a drone a robot. Unless there is a ‘kill switch’ which is easily accessible to humans built into every autonomous device and humanoid, we are designing our own guillotines and artificial Robespierre’s.
At our present point in history we have choice to carry on fighting each other for whatever imagined reason…or stop.
To do this successfully will require an intention to give back power to the individual citizen, as in the original concept of democracy in Ancient Greece.
In serious legal trials this principle is still of vital importance and present as the jury of twelve citizens. The jury ensures that a diversity of view points consider the facts of a case without prejudice to the defendant and then a unanimous vote is required for conviction. Debate is encouraged and can take weeks but has been proven to be the most fair system yet devised in legal cases.
When government by the people is dismissed and an autocrat with strong personal views and belief takes over power, right minded citizens are reduced to nodding dogs.
Like many I have often thought about the ‘ego’ and how it fits in with a contemporary search for spiritual enlightenment.
Ego is a term originating from Sigmund Freud and has a technical meaning in psychoanalysis which I shall not include in this essay as there are plenty of psychology books for those interested in a clinical version of the idea.
It’s common usage in English today is to mean that a person is vain and has an unjustified high opinion of themselves, however when we use the word to understand ourselves or ‘what makes us tick’, it has a more constructive purpose.
Ego is Latin for ‘I’ and this sense of ‘I’ works to develope our feelings all through life. I is the observer who perceives through the five physical senses. But this very act of ‘perception’ includes unconscious filtering, predjudices and biases to support what we believe. If this process is unconscious, how sure can we be about the ‘I’ personality we build up through life? How authentic to truth are we?
Whatever ‘I’ is, we can be certain that it rules a great deal of our conscious behaviour; in fact – almost everything.
This is where ‘spirituality’ may start to appeal to a person; to fill this uncertainty and distrust of a fake ‘persona’, accompanied by a suspicion that there must be something beyond personality. The ego is unlikely to admit there is a higher intelligence to it but on surrender of egotistic desires a person can expand their consciousness beyond the everyday.
There are three words which come together to form this expanded version of who we might be; ‘body’ ‘soul’ and ‘spirit’.
It is simple to understand that we are in a body. This was one of the first learning hurdles we had as a baby even though ‘being just a body’ is another of nature’s illusions. You can lose your legs in an accident and still be the same person.
Soul and spirit have various definitions which I shall not explore here. Let us merely propose that beyond our body and senses, there is more that is not within the experience of being me, even if it is mysterious!
In many cultures and traditions the spiritual journey aims to reach an alternative to ego called ‘enlightenment’. Many spiritual leaders claim to have abandoned their egoistic desires and become enlightened. The past remembers such people as prophets and saints but enlightened people are alive today, even if they do not realise it themselves! Perhaps the most beguiling such teacher on the internet is Eckhart Tolle who is candid about his transition into a non-ego driven life and gives gentle and amusing lectures to modern audiences. He does not couch his teaching within terms of any religion unless there is a need to use a specific word or idea. The core of his advice is transferring self guidance away from the ego to the higher self while letting life just happen without needing to control it for desires.
There was a famous Sufi who was stopped by a friend in the street by calling out his name. The Sufi replied, ‘he has gone and I hope he never comes back!’ Dying whilst alive is not part of doctrine in many religions, preferring instead to promise reward after physical death.
In ancient cultures around the world such as Egypt, temples were built mainly for the purpose of placing initiates into a non-egoic state. From here they would leave the body and after three days, just as sun, moon or distant star light fills the chamber, return as a resurrected being. The gnostic Jesus of Nazareth referred to this as being ‘born again’.
One might wonder then what part the ego has in the spiritual quest. Well, clearly the process is not as simple as just abandoning ego.
The truth is that the ego has a particularly strong hold over us, something that it is easy to underestimate. The process of ‘dying’ is anathema to the ego and it will do almost anything to stay alive. Being ‘frightened of dying’ is common for the general population and understandable. We have a choice. Either to be haunted by The Grim Reaper all your life or ‘die before you die’.
The Japanese Samurai in Feudal Japan were spiritually trained as well as being fearless warriors. They entered fights in which they were very likely to be killed for the simple reason that they had overcome the fear of death. What did it matter? The Templar knights in twelth century Europe went through a similar initiation process and were likewise, fearless warriors.
A Templar Knight picture credit Middle Temple
So when a person in modern times takes up the spiritual path and accepts that the final destination is an abandonment of ‘I’ and everything, the ego opens it’s playbook of dirty tricks. It will not give up without a fight to the death.
The most blatant of these is to transfer the feeling of ‘I’-ness into a new, highly spiritual ‘I’ personality.
When the ego is transferred to spirituality in this way, all hell can be let loose!
I once stood at a London rail station with some friends. We looked across the concourse to a large group of African Muslims dressed from head to toe in white robes. They were clearly performing the spiritual journey of the Hajj, bound for Mecca. The pilgrims strict dress code to wear white for humility and yet this group clearly ignored the spirit of the dress code. Their robes were over sized and flowing and their headgear voluminous so as to draw attention solely to project their imaginary high status.
The extremist armed groups of all faiths and political persuasions in modern times are twice as deadly and ruthless precisely because their egoistic sense of being ‘right’ holds power over others. The fact their their evil actions are the opposite of the religion their profess blinds them in a way that only the ego knows how to do.
The Spanish Inquisition operated what we might call today a ‘death squad’ against all the Christian principles of compassion and love, for over three hundred and fifty years.
picture credit: Ancient Origins
Even peaceful looking cross legged gurus and self style ‘god men’ in India and other with strong spiritual traditions, may secretly hide the fact that they have simply adopted the appearance of being spiritual for a variety of non-spiritual reasons. These might range from obtaining money and property, sexual exploitation of naïve followers, illusions of self importance and power over others.
Their conman techniques include dressing up elaborately clothing, hypnotic music, chanting and dance, illusory tricks such as surgery without incision, strict regimes of ritual, unquestioning obedience, removal of individuals from family and friends, shaming and praise and a thousand other deceits and conceits. It is the pyschology of the cult which promises a way to overcome personal egotistic desires but replaces them with the egotistic desires of the guru.
When ‘abandoning ego’ we are as vulnerable as a crab without a shell and great care is needed to value the role of the ego as something that keeps us going in a difficult even dangerous world. Ego is not something to be abandoned without something more real and more reliable to replace it. It is after all, the motor that gets us up in the morning and sustains us however frail and feint we may feel.
Perhaps the middle way is not to abandon egoistic ‘desires’ but to come to terms with them in such a way that our ego does not pull our higher self along like a dog on a lead. The path to perfection is to separate our consciousness from the ego as described in gnostic teachings. In this state, the ego must do as it is told be the highest benefit of oneself and others.
There are a series of paintings in Zen Buddhism which describe this process, one part of which is called ‘taming the bull’ where the bull is our ego.
Taming the Bull picture credit: thedawnwithin.com
The whip and rope are necessary,
Else he might stray off down some dusty road.
Being well trained, he becomes naturally gentle,
Then, unfettered, he obeys his master.
From “Zen Flesh, Zen Bones” by Paul Reps
The rider of the bull is then, that part of ourselves that has become separate and yet still connected to ego or ‘I’ ness. A connection to spirit without destroying the grounding ego gives us, is achieved through strict objectivity in attention and awareness, just as in the expression, ‘in the world but not of it.’
This enables our state of being to move into the ‘higher-self’ or ‘infinite consciousness’; our eternal and infinite connection with ‘all that is and ever shall be’ . It is attained not by the ‘achievements’ that we are encouraged to aim for by society, but by removal of our ‘imitation self’ or ‘personality’. Surrender, non-attachment and the knowledge of forgetting, are just three tools from the wisdom schools of the past which steered seekers of self knowledge long before the modern schools of psychoanalysis and psychiatry.
Matters Blog 