Leaving the Union

Ms. Smith stands before her Primary School class in an English State school on a very special day.

picture credit: Mathematics Mastery

“Good morning boys and girls! Now quiet please. Quiet. That’s better.

This morning we have a very special visitor who is going to listen to what WE think. This is instead of Nature Table which we will do tomorrow. No Peter, it is fair because the nature table with still be there tomorrow and the Prime Minister will not.

So I want you to welcome the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Mr Boris Johnson. Yes, you can clap if you want to children. Oh, you don’t want to, alright.

Mr. Johnson, you asked to listen to the adults of the future. Well here they are!”

“Wha, Wha, Wha, good morning Ms. Smith and good morrow boys and girls. I am really really interested in what you think about stuff.”

“Jimmy, why is your hand up?”

“What’s this bloke mean stuff Miss?”

“Ah! wwwwwell that’s a good question. You see being vague is a great way not to be specific but, but, but I see that may work in the House but not here. So I shall focus, robustly. Firstly, we have left that great monster known as the European Union in which you would have found opportunities for travel, education and work. So I want to know – from YOUR happy faces – what opportunities you believe have opened up for your futures, from Independence.’

A small girl waves a hand energetically.

‘My Dad says the UK has its sovereignty back but I cannot see that the UK has ever lost it’s sovereignty. Surely sovereignty is really Nationalism made to sound more respectable, is it not? No, don’t interrupt please Prime Minister that was a rhetorical question. Look at the evidence. What is the national flag of the United Kingdom? The Union flag, of course, not the EU flag. What is the currency of the United Kingdom? The pound, not the Euro. When we go on holiday, all the European cars have registration plates from their own countries, not European plates. Cars are insured in their home countries and are inspected annually in their home countries, and taxed in their home countries. The rules of the road are set nationally – we drive on the right, Europe on the left. It is true that passports were standardised by Europe but that streamlines free movement of people and increases border security. If you want another coloured cover with the UK crest on, you can buy one. There is no ‘identity card’ in the UK whereas most EU countries have one. All countries do things differently. Nationalism in Europe is alive and well, in my view.’

‘Thank you Marlene, that was very interesting wasn’t it Prime Minister?’

‘Bah bah, yes, bah, factually correct but my point is, dah, wouldn’t it be nice not to have to buy a new passport cover. £4 in Smith’s mine was. Many households cannot afford that.’

A small boy next to the water cooler stands up to speak.

‘I would like to bring up the subject of free trade. If the Germans sell cars to China within the EU rules, why can’t we? The EU has spent decades agreeing trade deals from the strong negotiating position that politically aligned block commands. These trade deals are largely responsible for making the UK wealthy and in a position to share it’s wealth and know how. The latest trade deal with South America is something the UK is now going to miss out on. By leaving the EU we will lose the benefits of hundreds of good trade deals all over the world and replace them with fewer deals on similar or worse terms. The new deal with the Japanese is an example. We already traded with Japan from within Europe. This new ‘deal’ greatly favours the Japanese. Individual trading countries like the UK’s now is, never negotiate from a position of strength.’

‘That is most interesting Nigel, wasn’t it Mr Johnson? I see you are speechless. So, Penny you have your hand up dear?’

‘I want to say that I want to work in Europe when I grow up.

Now if I even want to search for a job in France, I will not be allowed to for more than three months without returning to England, I will need medical insurance, will have to pay to exchange my money into euros and back again, pay high charges to phone my parents a few hundred miles away and my UK qualifications will not be considered valid. Am I destined to stack supermarket shelves in Calais?’

‘Wow, wow, wargh…just get a job in Blighty little girl. They speak English here!’

‘As do most Europeans. It’s a universal second language in Europe, excepting Estonia, Latvia and England, Dumbo.’

‘Penny, politeness is a classroom rule, please.

Ms. Smith moves on the questioning. ‘Can I ask you a question Prime Minister which is about taxation, health care, service industries, the Royal Family, national and European security, policing, defence, foreign aid, research and projects all of which are governed in law at a general level, by Westminster. What is left that is governed by Brussels?’

‘Are well, Brussels, ugh, is at the root of the problem because our views are not represented there…’

Bobby by the fish tank piped up. ‘Not true! What are MEP’s for if not to represent the UK? Why has the UK agreed to 95% of new European laws if it didn’t agree with them? I want to play with toys that are safe because EU law has made them safe. Not some dangerous toy from a third world factory.’

Another child stands up and leans forward taking an aggresive debating stance, ‘Yes, and I want my human rights protected by the European Court of Human Rights, not by a national government of any political persuasion!’

‘…werg, werg, what what I mean is that some of our laws are made in Brussels and some of those are very bad for us indeed. Very bad.’

Girl with plaits in the second row. ‘Which laws?’

‘Erg well, let me see, the Common Agricultural Policy for instance hands out money to farmers for nothing. We want to pay farmers for looking after birds and bees. Isn’t that what you want for your futures?’

‘Modern industrial farming methods have driven the wildlife to the edges of extinction not by European law. Organic, sustainable farming costs less than fertiliser guzzling intensive farms. Coupled with the public’s expectation of cheap food, as is the American farming model and you have a perfect storm against the environment. We don’t need laws, we need farmers with who produce food ethically and affordably.

Johnson points a finger meaninglessly and retorts, ‘Ah, yes, well what does the apple in your lunch box cost little boy? Eh?’

‘It costs the lives of fewer bees because the EU has banned the pesticides that kill bees and other insects. Without EU laws which protect the environment our futures would be bleak – factory farmed food from the USA will flood domestic markets. Lamb producers in the Welsh mountains will be priced out of business. Where is the independence in that?’

‘Yes, yes, yes, well since you like farming young man you can get a job as a picker all over the UK, anywhere you want because there will be no Europeans in our fields picking.’

The young child is not convinced. ‘Picking is seasonal and the climate in the UK means one must travel south in the winter for work. To move around the EU freely without borders.’

A tall and slim girl who until now has been looking out of the window raises and arm, stands and begins…

‘Prime Minister. There are clearly many areas where the UK is now going to struggle without the benefits of close partnership with it’s nearest neighbours. Australia for instance looks to the Pacific Rim countries for it’s trade and service industries. Historically the old Commonwealth loyalties went out of the window when the UK joined the EEC. That was a strategic decision made then and we cannot call upon ‘loyalty to the Empire or Commonwealth any longer’. The UK like Spain and Japan and many other European countries have moved on from the values of Empire for realistic, modern ethical reasons. Empire for the UK was an episode of shame. If we now claim to value sovereignty, we have to show respect for the sovereignty of other countries. Take Scotland, Ireland and Wales as an example. If we follow your argument to ‘take back control’, is this not a green flag for the break up of the United Kingdom?’

‘Bbbbblimey. How old are you?’

‘Please answer my question.’

‘Well of course not, we are a Unionist party and we want the United Kingdom to stay firmly together as one great nation. We shall do this by not allowing the Scottish people to have a referendum on their future. That’s the Scots out of the way. What’s the other place? Ah! Wales, well, we still have lots of castles in Wales don’t we, hah, hah! Joke! Just kidding! Wales voted to remain in the United Kingdom, I mean in the European Union so yes, we might expect trouble there but nothing I cannot overrule. And then there is the thorny question of Northern Ireland and the Good Friday Agreement that those Yanky Doodles seem to take a high moral stand about. Well, I think my brilliant idea of an underwater border making Northern Ireland AS IF it was part of the EU should not be taken as an indication it should join it’s friends, family, partners and Unionists IN Europe. Union of an island is not a good idea…when it’s Ireland you are talking about, I mean…not us.’

As if he was wondering what he had just said, the PM pauses, then restarts as if inspired,

‘…and unless you are talking about uniting a continent…whereas union of our island of Britain is because our passports are now blue and we intend to remain blue and British…with Northern Ireland that is, unless they vote otherwise…’

The Prime Minister turns to Ms. Smith and hisses in her ear not very discretely…’vargh, it’s so unfair these children asking difficult questions. You told me it would be easy, I came unprepared. Eton is not all it’s cracked up to be you know, just because I sound posh doesn’t mean I know what I am talking about. It’s not like State schools where there is a common aim of high academic standards and creating descent human beings. No, I mean I was bbbbullied you know and that Latin teacher… I mean horrible things went on…’

He is interupted by a boy bouncing eagerly on his seat and waving his arm in the air.

‘Miss, miss, miss can I ask a question about border control and how countries only control their borders in one direction and how Eire may make their UK border harder, undermining the Good Friday Agreement?’

‘No, Simon I am afraid we would love to ask that question but we are out of time and the Prime Minister is a busy man.’

‘Thank you children for this morning. Just remember that channel tunnel links us with the whole of Europe and beyond, as does Dover, so we are not going to forget our friends over there.’

‘And the channel tunnel links the whole of Europe and beyond with four small countries, who cannot agree…’ piped in Simon.

The PM stood up uncomfortably from his rather small chair and turned eagerly to Ms. Smith as she gestured him to step out of the room first.

‘What’s for lunch then Ms. Smith? Fish? Thank heavens we didn’t get any questions about fish eh! (laughs) Especially since UK cod comes from Greenland and Norway. I bet they would have known that, and that herring and lobster and scallops that we fish, are mostly sold to Europe. My they are well informed your children, at least we got education right. Is it this way? I shall just follow my nose. Bah!

Cosmic Chickens and Cosmic Eggs

Which came first, God or the Universe? This is a question for which philosopher scientists in the West, have no answer.

Steven Hawking in ‘The Brief History of Time’ put the problem like this;

So long as the Universe had a beginning, we could suppose it had a creator. But if the universe is really completely self contained, having no boundary or edge, it would have neither beginning nor end: it would simply be. What place then, for a creator?

The so called ‘Big Bang’ theory is seriously under review by scientists. They have no proven model on who started the Big Bang, and who started the starter. Steven Hawking is quite rightly asking how a universe without limits could have been created.

The problem, it seems to me is one of thought patterns and in particular logic anomalies. Such an anomaly is simply the notion of infinity. Even mathematics cannot contain the concept. It just describes numbers that keep getting closer to zero but never quite being small enough to be zero; clearly nonsense.

It is easy to demonstrate infinity in a three dimensional shape as a ball (or for space travel, a torus). The infinity experienced, say as a sailor going around the world, is indeed without boundary…but only for the sailor. In an infinite universe there are an infinite number of balls because not everyone is a sailor.

It is interesting that Steven Hawking chooses to describe the Creator with a small ‘c’. It subtly gives away what he thinks the answer is. As a scientist he cannot sign up to the improbable and even less so the impossible. He doubts there is a God.

But in my humble opinion, what we are discussing here is our own perception created by the phantoms that logic sometimes produces. The most famous example of this is the old question; which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Just as the circumnavigating sailor fails to introduce ‘space’ into his world view, so observers of chickens are limited by the time it takes to make a chicken. If we accept Darwinian ‘natural selection’ as the creeping process of improving the DNA of living beings, we can understand living things a little better.

We accept that chickens were one time flying birds and before that dinosaurs. Dinosaurs also reproduced by laying eggs, so at some point in the DNA mutation, the bird family split from dinosaurs and became egg laying birds. We must therefore change our question to; ‘which came first, the dinosaur or the egg?’

Are we now approaching the point of mutation? Possibly, but like the differential equation, dinosaurs became dinosaurs infinitely slowly.

If you are still following, let me introduce a counter intuitive observation on how nature works. They say that in the plant kingdom, the first plants had no flowers, just leaves and plenty of them, presumably for dinosaurs to eat. Then one extraordinary day something made a flower appear on a plant – just like that! Evolution sometimes takes giant leaps. Instead of the minute steps in evolutionary change, nature takes a giant risk and does something completely new. Evidence of this willingness to take a completely new track are the rare and often unique animals found on islands like the Galapagos Islands, Madagascar and Australia.

With this idea in mind, evolution does not have to be by micro steps, although most of the time is clearly is. One day, there are no plants without reproduction by the production of spores, then there is a whole new system of stamens and pollen and receptors.

If we can accept that at one time dinosaurs or their predecessors or their predecessors, went from non-egg / sperm reproduction to the full Monty, then we can see that the baffling question is using false logic.

There never was a first egg or first dinosaur. There does not have to be, as the process leading to this mode of reproduction is a combination of imperceptibly small most of the time, plus one or more inspired leaps.

This whole question is a useful metaphor for the more philosophical question about who created the Creator?

In my view, when modern scientists propose the theory that the universe is infinite in space and time, then the question of how it started is a logic fallacy. At the same time the question of who created the big bang is also irrelevant, as no one did.

This is where I express a view, in favour of spelling Creator with a capital. In my view, the model of an infinite space time universe is correct. There never was ‘nothing’ in the same way as there never was an egg before the chicken. It is impossible for a universe or even a chicken to appear without a cause. As Shakespeare says in the character of King Lear; ‘Nothing comes from nothing, speak again’.

So here I am expounding the cause for the Creator who is contained within, rather than without the Universe. Such a Creator can be as large as the Universe and as old as the Universe. Such a creator can make things within the Universe without contradiction, because it is simple for an infinite creative intelligence to exist in an infinite universe or even multiple universes!

Ancient Hindu scriptures describe the universe as an Ocean which is being churned by a giant snake being stretched by two opposing teams in a tug of war. One team are devils and the other team, humans. The movement of the snake in one direction is the expansion of the universe and visa versa. Scientists know the observable universe is expanding and accelerating in it’s expansion, so no contradiction there.

At some point the motion of the churn will stop and change direction. Then the universe will shrink, but never down to nothing. The notion of ‘singularity’ proposed by the Big Bang theorists, stretches or rather shrinks one’s logical understanding to absurdity.

It is impossible for the universe to shrink into an infinitely small space. What does it even matter how small or how large the universe gets? The question is similar to the chicken and egg question because it is playing with words, not realities.

Just because the question can be asked, does not mean there is an answer. This is the essence of the understanding koans give in Zen Buddhism.

The Old Testament has an interesting take on ‘how the world began’. All human cultures ask this question and come up with various ideas. The Old Testament however is uncannily parallel to the modern scientific view of the stages of the evolution of the ‘world’ or universe. Once you realise that ‘day’ in old Testament terms means an infinitely long era, you can examine the stages more thoroughly. I shall not go into these here and leave that journey to the reader. However if we start with the universe being no more than an infinitely large cosmic cloud – we have travelled long before dinosaurs and eggs.

Intelligent energy in the form of light was introduced into the void;

1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

Place in every particle of this cloud a Divine intelligence, and you get the idea of how ‘stuff’ started.

1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.

Interesting to note that light was introduced (a transverse wave form) and then sound (a compression wave form).

The waves started to ‘sift’ the cloud and ‘islands’ of matter appeared amongst the ‘waters’ or what I am calling ‘the cloud’.

The intelligence is very much part off the creation process, the spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters, is not a separate intelligence operating from afar.

Such a belief in the ‘separateness’ of God is a problem for many people today.

The old Renaissance idea of ‘God on high’ floating around in the sky has permeated this ‘otherness’ into modern human assumptions.

There is no chicken that makes eggs, like cars coming out of a factory, when it comes to trying to understand the Universe. Our thinking has to be so precise that it includes the biases within the observer’s observations. Scientist have also come to the understanding that we ‘change what we observe’ just by being. What is extraordinary and not generally realised, but this capacity, is exactly the same capacity of a Creator. But then I am a believer in a Creator contained in every essence of the creation the hearts of each one of us. Call me radical.

Carrying the Sky

Question: how many stars can you see in the daytime?

Answer: One

That star is, of course, our sun and yet sometimes we overlook it’s splendour and magnificence. It becomes one of those many blessings that we take for granted when we consider ourselves poor.

The thief left it behind

The moon at the window

Basho

This poem was written by a mendicant monk in Japan after a thief took his only possession from his cave – his begging bowl.

Both the sun and moon represent powerful forces in our lives. They dominate our lives and loves in the most subtle of ways.

If you live in a part of the world where the appearance of the sun is unusual, then a ‘nice sunny day’ is one for being outside, perhaps even ‘sunbathing’. Deep in our beings we have a natural dependency and love of the healing rays of the sun that we wish only to be in it’s presence.

So strong was this connection in ancient times, that the Sun was regarded as a god by many cultures. The ancient Egyptians named him ‘Ra’. In their paintings and hieroglyphs, Ra is depicted spreading rays down to human figures, usually the Pharaoh. At the end of each ray is a hand sometimes holding an ‘Ankh’ or symbol of life.

One pharaoh called Akhenaten, ordered that the old Egyptians gods should no longer be worshipped expect for ‘Aten’. He referred to himself as the ‘son of God’ and is depicted with his wife, Nefertiti and children as a ‘holy family’, a theme later echoed by Christianity. Akhenaten even moved the capital city called Akhentaten. The temples had no roofs to allow in Aten’s rays.

He was not the last to conceive of a ‘sun city’. Louis 14th bathed in the name of ‘The Sun King’ and adopted the sun as a symbol of his reign. He moved his royal court and government to the Palace of Versailles in 1682, from where his presence shone for all the gaze and wonder, at least until the solar eclipse which was the French Revolution.

The tradition continued into modern times when the French-Swiss architect, Le Corbusier designing a ‘radiant city’ or ‘Ville Radieuse’.

He too was had Utopian ideals but this time it was the common man who would bath in the all powerful rays of the sun. High rise buildings would be aligned in straight lines and wide spaces to allow light to spill into living spaces through large windows. All rooms were designed according to the proportions of the human body, as did the Ancient Egyptians, evidenced in the works of the mystic and scholar, Schwaller de Lubiz.

My point is that the Sun God has shone on mankind for thousands of years and it should not be hidden in ‘plain sight’.

If mankind needed a reminder, then the moon makes a perfect counter balance to the sun’s majesty. It has no light of it’s own yet can reflect with great brilliance in the night sky. The moon has an enduring power over humankind as a symbol of our ability to ‘reflect’ on ideas. This enables us to absorb and process ‘light’ as what we call ‘inspiration’ and underpins most of human development.

At some point in time, after the belief of Royalty being the sun God’s representative on earth, modern humans accept the reality that they, ordinary people, can do this as well.

Not only have we internalised the moon, but so may we swallow the sun.

‘The sun is in my heart

and I am ready for love,’

So sang Gene Kelly in the famous film, ‘Singing in the Rain’.

The place of abode for the sun is traditionally in the heart. The Indian Hindu mystics place the sun just below the heart in the ‘solar plexus’ chakra and it’s proximity is significant. The essence of ‘life’ is contained in the chambers of the heart muscle. It’s protein molecules are designed never to stop working – like the nuclear fission process in the sun; at least for the length of life of the human body. If a heart ever stops it can be powered back to life with a large charge of electricity from a defribilator.

Go sweep out the chamber of your heart.
Make it ready to be the dwelling place of the Beloved.
When you depart out,
He will enter it.
In you,
void of yourself,
will He display His beauties.

Mahmud Shabistari

I have quoted this beautiful verse before in my blogs as these lines, in my view, give humans all the information they need. They tell us that something is wrong in our hearts; they need to be swept out. Just as the skies fill with clouds and obscure the sacred sun the sacred moon, so too our hearts become obscured.

We get an idea of the size of the cleansing required in the psychological story of Hercules and his fifth labour;

The fifth labour (0f Hercules) was to clean the stables of King Augeas. This assignment was intended to be both humiliating and impossible, since these divine livestock were immortal, and had produced an enormous quantity of dung. The Augean stables (/ɔːˈdʒiːən/) had not been cleaned in over 30 years, and over 1,000 cattle lived there. However, Heracles succeeded by re-routing the rivers Alpheus and Peneus to wash out the filth.

Excerpt from Wikipedia

Note how the livestock are described as having ‘divine’ and ‘immortal’ qualities normally reserved for Kings. It is clear that even the cattle knee deep in their own dung, can aspire to being divine. Naturally, the cleaning takes place using the power nature, in this case water, a symbol of clarity, purity and power. Would it be too speculative to suggest they are the powerful arteries and veins of the human heart?

The Ancient Egyptians believed that Ra, the sun, was present in the heart of every human being; each human contained a small sun. They carried this divine power until death when the soul or Ra, departed the earthly body and returned to heaven and the afterlife.

This tradition is remembered in the Christian tradition as the ‘resurrection’ and in Islam as the ‘Mi raj’ or ascent of the Prophet Mohammed (s.a.s.) to heaven.

Note in this early painting the human headed horse on which the prophet (s.a.s.) sits. It is called the Buraq which means in Arabic ‘lightning’ or ‘bright’ with thanks to Wikipedia.

So we may reasonably conclude that we have revered the sun and the moon as symbols of our interior lives. We sometime express these divine principles in our buildings, our cities and our environment.

The sky is the most unchangeable, immutable presence in our lives and deserves contemplation and absorption where it can spin and shine for ever, if we let it.

Bring me sunshine
In your smile
Bring me laughter
All the while
In this world where we live
There should be more happiness
So much joy you can give
To each brand new bright tomorrow

lyrics by Sylvia Dee for Morecombe and Wise’s theme song