From the famous referendum vote in 2017, we can infer very little, other than the British people want less immigration from Europe and more money for the NHS. Some were convinced that leaving the EEC would free up money to be spent on the NHS – if a slogan on the side of a bus is a promise.

The NHS has become one of the largest employers in Europe, a huge organisation and expensive. The question has to be asked, are there any other ways the NHS could raise money, other than indirectly by Brexit?

One obvious way would be to claim back money from Europeans given medical treatment in the UK. At present the NHS spends about 600 million pounds on such treatment to European visitors and yet recovers a mere tenth of that. Remove the ‘European’ element of such costs and there is left the ‘medical tourists’ from all over the world, coming to the UK and suddenly discovering they need expensive treatment. Should the tax payer be paying for this? Simple laws, like a requirement to take out private medical insurance when you enter the country as a temporary or permanent resident, has to be a good solution. After they have contributed in taxes for a calculated number of years, they are eligible for free treatment. Not in the arrivals lounge at Heathrow.

Governments have been very keen to take up public / private contracts in the construction industry, known as PPI’s. Such partnerships could also be made in the health service. One obvious place where there would be immediate benefit is the A and E Departments. I can imagine a private A and E department built within hospital grounds, say a storey above a new multi level car park. The parking can be allocated to staff as part of their contract employment, thus improving staff retention. The private A and E will offer treatment within thirty minutes for a set fee. This amount would be in the region of eighty to one hundred pounds. Many a person seeking stitches or an X-ray – would be grateful for the option to pay and eliminate long waiting times. The NHS would start to meet it’s waiting time targets as a result.

The NHS spends a lot of money each year on compensation for mistreatment. This has no doubt resulted from the growth of the ‘compensation culture’ in British society and the proliferation of ‘ambulance chasing’ lawyers. Lawyers often obtain more in their fees than the litigants!

And yet these are the people who want more money for the NHS, the referendum voters and believers in the ‘battle bus’ promise of 350 million pounds a week for the NHS. But one would like to think that there is an alternative to seeking monetary compensation. Sometimes an apology is all that is morally needed. If there are no lifetime costs as a result of mistreatment, then morally, I would ask for no compensation. I prefer NHS money to be spent on healing people, not paying off my mortgage.

The bottom line is that the NHS is a potential ‘black hole’ for money. These are just a few suggestions for saving money and there are no doubt many more. Ultimately though, the expectations of UK and foreign people have to be educated to expect less and pay more. The models of other European countries might give the NHS a few ideas, but then, we don’t like Europe or its standards do we?

The Encyclopedia Britannica defines conspiracy theory as ‘an attempt to explain harmful or tragic events as the result of the actions of small powerful group. Such explanations reject the accepted narrative surrounding those events; indeed the official version may be seen as further proof of the conspiracy.’

One of the definitions of ‘conspiracy’ in Dictionary.com is;

A combination of persons for a secret, evil or unlawful purpose.

***

There was a discussion on the radio this morning about conspiracy theories and whether social media had influenced their proliferation. One commenter described a conspiracy theory as ‘fallacious’ – that is having no proof.

That however is a criticism pertinent to all theories, including Einsteins’ Theory of Relativity. The lack of proof is not seen as problematic in science, since one needs a theory at the start of the experimentation, before there is proof. It may be that the theory is ahead of the ability of technicians to create laboratory experiments, or that there is no sensor yet invented to detect an effect being postulated. This has never stopped scientists imagining possibilities using mathematical models rather than instruments. Einsteins’ mathematical proof that light, bends has only recently been proved using astronomical instruments.

Lack of evidence then, should not stop scientists, philosophers, theologians, artists, poets, politicians from postulating.

Consider the postulation, ‘God exists’. To date, this theory has not been scientifically proven and yet billions of people believe it; even model their whole lives on it. Does that mean believers are part of a conspiracy? Certainly, level headed insurers reject claims caused by ‘acts of God’

The conspiracy being alleged is always open to doubt. The persons believing the conspiracy do not generally offer, indisputable proof. We all know that photographs and videos (once considered to be true) can now be easily manipulated.

Even a reporter or journalist is normally required to provide corroborated information of a story, usually from at least three independent sources, before the story is published. Even then, others will object that the story is just a ‘theory’ or, as is now rather glibly alleged, ‘fake’.

Conspiracy theorists who use the word ‘theory’, will retain the respect of others for so doing. The next evolutionary step however, is that the postulator believes the theory – even without incontrovertible proof. We see this process in popular detective stories, where the famous detective has a ‘hunch’ that he can’t prove. The intervention of the intuitive area of the mind, presents itself as a kind of ‘magical’ power of the detective. Even though the scent stops at the river, he or she picks it up on the other side.

Scientists do this, probably more often than they know. ‘Mistakes’ happen in laboratories and the logical line of reason is skipped over, savings years of work. The line of reasoning then works backwards to prove the original premise.

In a conspiracy theory, the official version of events is challenged. One might call this somewhat facetiously, ‘my version of the facts’ – but that is what is happening. Facts are challenged or ignored and often ‘new information’ presented. The official story is regarded as no more than what psychologists term a ‘rationalisation’ – in other words a reasonable explanation. Conspiracy theorists offer new ‘evidence’ from respected and unrespected sources, because their ‘gut feeling’ is telling them the official reason is unreasonable, uncorroborated, unproven or based on false information.

Take the assassination of John F Kennedy. The person accused of the act had the means, motive and opportunity to commit the act. What is ignored is that so could have many others, standing along the road that day. This ‘smoke screen’ to the actual events is often used as a plot device by writers of detective stories. The ‘red herrings’ divert the reader from the true events, all of which have been honestly presented.

‘My version of the facts’ becomes a truism double edged and lethal to human beliefs. We all know that history is written by the victor and / or a powerful minority.

With facts being so available now using the power of the internet, we can all access them and feel a certain glow of ‘expertise’ – even though we have no in depth or practical knowledge of the subject. Parents refuse treatment for their sick children because they don’t believe the doctors.

In such a world, few of us have the mental capacity to fit together the pieces of the jigsaw, because it has a million pieces and no picture. Only the next generation of quantum computers will be able to make decisions based on the huge amount of data available.

Conspiracy Theories of the future will be postulated by computers. The question is, will the computers themselves, start to believe them?

Okay, here is the scenario. Queen Elizabeth II, sadly, passes away. We don’t want this to happen, but we know she is human and nearing the end of her life expectancy. What will happen next?

Repercussions, repercussions…well, one consequence will be that the Commonwealth of Nations, of which she has been so proud over the years, will no longer have a person in the role of Head of the Commonwealth. This is important because her successor does not inherit the role automatically.

Imagine then a delay, a negotiating period whilst the role of the new incumbent is discussed.

At the same time as this process is taking place, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom is riding the roller coaster of post-Brexit in 2019. The final negotiations with the EU had a poor outcome for the UK. Europe was united in making the UK an example, before any other member states had the same idea. If the UK preferred to leave the club they will no longer have access to the benefits. This meant that the UK, which became wealthy as a trading nation, looked around for more countries with which to trade. The 15% tariffs for goods from within the EU made them often, too expensive. Not only that, countries like Germany, were subsidising their car industry and encouraging skilled migrant labour that could no longer work in the UK, to work for them.

Some bright spark in the British Civil Service spotted in Wikipedia, that the Commonwealth of Nations covers 29,958,050 km squared of the world’s land surface – about twenty per cent. On this land live 2,419 million people. A huge market!

The politicians ate this bait and set up working parties to establish free trade with these countries as soon as possible. They soon discovered that membership of the Commonwealth already included free trade amongst member states. That is when the international lawyers were called in. They had to negotiate formal multi-lateral trade agreements and / or bilateral agreements, with as many Commonwealth countries as possible.

Unfortunately the pressures then exerted had an unexpected consequence. Countries that had been used to just sending athletes to the Commonwealth Games every four years, found themselves hosting un-invited trade delegations from the old colonial power. Governments felt their collars being held by their ex-colonial masters and it sent a shudder down their spines. Protests in the streets and the burning of the Union flag in public places gave politicians the confidence to call their diplomats back from the UK for serious consultations.

The trade delegations were sent back to the UK from most countries, including Australia, with their tails between their legs. The scars of colonisation run deep and the scars take many generations, not enough generations yet, to heal.

So, the house of cards began to fall. One after the other, Commonwealth countries resigned from membership, as is their right.

With no Head of the Commonwealth in post and an ever diminishing number of member countries, the unthinkable motion was discussed in the Houses of Parliament. ‘Is the Commonwealth of Nations an outdated institution?’

The UK’s desperate need for new trading partners had exposed it’s shortage of commercial shipping tonnage (on which the British Empire had been built), had put misplaced pressure on countries eager to find fault outside their own incompetence, had failed to agree a definition of ‘free trade’ within the Commonwealth and placed a spot light in the shadow that is the belief that the UK out of Europe will be ‘independent’.

In the twenty first century world of globalism, ‘independence’ is an outdated fantasy. Countries, and States within countries, which co-operate with each other, have a greater advantage, militarily and commercially, than those that don’t. 

The Commonwealth Games in 2022 were boycotted by those countries that had still not officially left the Commonwealth.

Despite attempts to ‘re-brand’ the organisation as the ‘Common Values Organisation’ or ‘Common Peoples Organisation’ their differences were now clearly greater than what they held in common. The ‘wealth’ of the UK had never been shared with other countries, neither within Europe or it’s old colonies. The common values had been shared and of that the UK could be proud. The common values were often central to the Queen’s speech on Christmas Day. The values of the twenty first century though had changed from brotherhood to me and mine both within the ex colonial master’s country and the old colonies. 

And when that happens, history informs us, the consequence is usually war. 

I am in favour of discrimination. That may be an unpleasant thought for many people – but let me explain. To ‘discriminate’ means simply to distinguish or separate one thing from another. In popular parlance the word has aquired the same meaning as ‘prejudice’ but clearly they mean different things. Prejudice is to discriminate in favour of one part over another for reasons of negative emotions rather than reason. To ‘discriminate’ then can be useful or not. Consider the uses.

I once went to Carmarthen in South Wales armed with a guide book to wild flowers. I had no knowledge on the subject and to me one flower was much like any other. But forty years or so ago the rural roadsides were abundant with wild flowers – prior to industrial farming and ‘agrochemicals’ much favoured by the custodians of the countryside – farmers – but that is another subject!

Anyway, I had to creep along edge of the road with book in hand learning one by one the different flower types. This is done by colour, number of petals, stamens, type of leaf. Everything about flowers in the British Isles was in this book because someone had been there before me and was sharing the results of their journey. Discrimination between one flower and the next was a journey not only to naming but unexpectedly – enjoyment. You might think that you do not need a menu to enjoy a meal and to some extent this is true. But to go to the absolute limit of enjoyment to understand the component parts and label them, makes enjoyment complete – ask any top chef.

Perhaps this is what spurred on our Victorian ancestors to travel the globe categorising flora and fauna and filling the museums of the home country with their findings. There are drawers of butterflies in the Natural History Museum in London, each with a label containing precise information, cross referenced and catalogued. Glass cabinets reach to the ceiling as places of last resort for the bodies of exotic birds each with genus and species recorded for all time.

There is a film called The Draughtsman’s Contract by Peter Greenaway (1982), which featured characters numbering the leaves in a tree. The flavour of the time was an art inspired compulsion towards list making and categorisation. Perhaps in it’s time it was a reference to the Victorian obsession with collecting and sifting and the insights it brings.

We are passed that now. Artificial intelligence can determine the contents of a supermarket shopping bag at the check out in a second. The counting, the establishment of order is not something humans do easily using conscious thought. From the tedium of that task we moved away into the promised land. We can switch off our need to understand how things are arranged, knowing that it has been done or can be done far quicker than we can ever do. The catalougisation is over.

Even the spaces between galaxies have been found to be full of the correct amount of anti-matter to match the visible universe (once 80% of matter was missing!) The stars have their numbers even though they are too all intents and purposes infinite in number, don’t worry about that.

Don’t believe me? Well The Sky at Night this month told me that even the spaces between galaxies have been found to be full of the correct amount of anti-matter to match the visible universe (previously 80% of matter was missing!) And what we can see – the stars – all have their numbers even though they are, to all intents and purposes, infinite in number – don’t worry about that.

In the twenty first century we may sit back, put up our feet and wait until such and such a list needs checking – pick up our phones or log on and see how everything is. Pity that. I liked to smell the flowers, watch the bees and hum a little myself. The space between words and numbers – well that always has been and always will be poetry.

Some people known as the ‘death doulas’ are determined to break down the barriers that make ‘death’ a taboo subject. There is a place called the ‘death café’ where people who are dying, meet the ‘death doulas’. On the menu are the following genuine questions;

(source; The Guardian Newspaper Wed 3^rd Feb 2016 article ‘Meet the Death Doulas’)

The answers are completely vacuous but intended to bring a scythe-like smile.

What makes a good death?

Taking out a law suit against Microsoft for using the message fatal error in Windows 10, applying for life insurance, applying for bankruptcy, buying a brewery, pretending to die several times in front of your relatives, access to plenty of cushions,

Can you prepare for death and dying?

Disable the air bags in your car, build a pyramid, pack a suitcase, learn the harp, enter a burning building without protective equipment to get an idea of ‘the other place’, empty the fridge, don’t buy green bananas, more cushions

What do you say to a friend who is facing death?

‘Cheer up,’ ‘I have to confess everything,’ ‘Well I am sorry I just thought a chicken costume would brighten your day,’ ‘weather is going to be better by next week,’ ‘ever thought of becoming a vegetarian?’ ‘I’m visiting you from now on – your husband has gone on a cruise,’ ‘ The hospice wants to start a bagpipe band,’ ‘ The Mafia are after me; would you live in my flat for a short while?’ ‘ The hospital are submitting their success rate figures this week. You’ve got to leave.’ ‘Sorry I gave you a shock – this scythe is for cutting the grass this afternoon.’ ‘Do you want a cushion? ‘

What can we learn from death?

The Highway Code is not as stupid as it seems, do not trust bungee jump instructors, some food is not as good as it looks, commercial airlines do not carry parachutes, tattoo your intended last words on your wrist, death is not all it’s cracked up to be, if I had gone to university what good would it do me now? Cushions are a blessing,

What does it mean to leave a legacy?

Empty the rubbish bins, mow the lawn, publish your school poems as an e-book, publish everything as an e-book, someone else is going to have to put those shelves up now – Someone else will like that pile of cushions.

Part One – A Clear Majority

At three o’clock in the morning, an official envelope was placed on the desk by the Chief Civil Servant, Sir Comfey, with an imperceptibly trembling hand.

‘The referendum result, Prime Minister,’ he announced in a calmly hysterical voice. This uncharacteristic ‘chink in armour’ produced a shudder of expectation around the room.

The gaze of the assembled ministers and staff was fixed on a magnificent ‘Victory Within Europe’ cake. It posed ostentatiously and nervously at one end of the Prime Ministers desk, surrounded by a galaxy of plates and silver cutlery. One of it’s candle’s, leant perilously to one side, as if presaging a cosmic domino effect.

The Prime Minister lifted the envelope with the tip of his precious ‘A Present from Malta’ letter opener. It reminded him of ex prime minister Churchill and how he saved small islands from disaster.

‘Should I be worried, Comfy? Is it…I mean…is it the result I am expecting?’ His eyebrows appeared to cross and float upward to his retreating hairline, like barage baloons in a Blitzed sky.

‘I think you should open it and see, Prime Minister…’ Comfy replied knowing that M16 had been all over it’s contents previous to the official sealing. A nervously calm hand slid the shaking blade into the corner of the envelope and slit it’s stomach; gutting the contents from which he read,

Votes for the UK to remain in Europe; 25,749,321

Votes for the UK to leave Europe; 25,749,322

The Prime Minister supported his forehead with his hand as he re-read the appalling news. His mind was skimming through a list of ‘implications and consequences’ in the way that only senior managers and the mentally ill can. Key amongst these was the realisation that this result would mean he will have to make an embarrassing resignation speech. All his life he has hated public humiliation and now, by one vote, he will have to grovel before the nation as a full-on loser.

But hold on reader, this Prime Minister’s political instinct (code named ‘pride in my country’) was smelling a rabbit hole to scuttle down. Read on.

‘Are you sure this is correct? It is, er, awfully close?’

‘NEOLVS – the new electoral on line voting system –  is faultless sir, which is why, if I may be permitted to remind you, you yourself championed it over the…(finger poised on lower lip ) what was that rather apt phrase you used, ‘prehistoric paper system open to too many convenient errors?‘

‘Yes, yes, you don’t have to remind me. It had to be my fault…it usually is…’

A nervous silence fell upon the room amongst the assembled special advisers, politicians and civil servants as they sensed the dark shadow moving across the country.

True statesmanship is often summoned by small gestures and the forthcoming moment of decision was signalled by the Prime Ministers left and then right eye brows coming back down to their more usual positions and the hand being removed from the forehead.

‘And am I correct in recalling, Sir Comfy, that this computer system allows us to find out who voted what…under extreme circumstances in which there is a threat to national security of course?’

‘Correct Prime Minister,’ (forever one step ahead), ‘and am I thinking that there may be such a threat contained in that envelope?’

‘Absolutely, Sir Comfy, the whole of the United Kingdom is poised to float off into the Gulf Stream!’

An imperceptible titter circled as a Mexican wave around the room.

‘I want to know…I need to know now, who was the very last person to vote at 21:59:59 hours on 23^rd June 2016. Who made this ill informed casting vote? Do you understand?’

The gusto with which the Prime Minister now was taking command, indicated to Sir Comfy that he was resolutely in pursuit of not making the resignation speech that he himself had taken such pains to sculpt to perfection, several weeks ago.

‘Such a pity,’ thought Sir Comfy, ‘such a fine blend of mock self sacrifice and unrestrained patriotism.’ But events were taking an un/expected turn.

‘Yes, Prime Minister,’ and clicked his fingers behind him as a non-verbal instruction to an aide, to return with this information within the next ten minutes or be on cat feeding duty for the next six months.

As the aide slipped out of the room, on cue, the No.10 cat, (renamed Cleggpuss in memory of a recent akward political partnership ) slipped in. The two black glossy doors shut in partnership.

After precisely nine minutes and ten seconds the aide returned clasping a nugget of computer paper which he conspicuously flattened out on the Prime Minister’s desk.

The PM skewered it with a cold sweaty finger and read;

Alice Mercury, 38, Clifton Terrace, Knightsbridge, London. Date of birth…

He squinted at Alice’s birthday, then grimaced with exasperation.

‘My God man, she had only just turned sixteen the previous day! If this blob of DNA had hung around in the womb a day or two longer, the United Kingdom would not be tilted on the edge of the precipice into which we are now about to precipitate.’

‘Need I remind you with total respect Sir, that you saw this as a’ …he cleared his throat with a high cough… ‘that vulgar phrase – a vote winner – namely reducing the minimum voting age from eighteen to sixteen Prime Minister…’

‘Yes, yes, but I remember you telling me quite plainly in that ‘know everything’ way of yours that all young people wanted to remain in Europe. Now one of them has wittingly or unwittingly, screwed the whole country!’

‘It appears so, Prime Minister. Under the rules of a referendum, as I am sure you know, a majority is a majority.’

‘Yes, but one nose ring infected school girl, effectively taking decisions of national interest! It, it goes against all common sense! And no Comfry! By that irratating ‘ironic’ look of yours I am not referring to myself, I am referring to this Alice creature!’ and he screwed up the offending piece of paper on which her name resided and tossed it angrily it at a strident Clegg Puss, missing by a whisker.

Sir Comfy had passively managed many important decisions in his blame evading career. Now he rose to the occasion with a deft sweep of his arm, ordering everyone, to leave the room. Clegg Puss was swept up in the arms of one of the junior secretaries and the doors slammed shut on the aborted victory celebration. Sir Comfy broke the sudden silence with even higher pitched cough.

‘Perhaps, I might suggest a remedial course of action Prime Minister. It may not work but then again…’

‘Go on…’

‘Well, if Miss Mercury could be approached discretely of course and persuaded to change her mind?’

‘Change her mind? What is the point of that? You yourself have said that the decision is final!’

‘I am thinking of a second referendum, Prime Minister, on the grounds that…oh…shall we say, the official server was hacked by the North Koreans or Russians, making the result of the first referendum unsound.’ Sir Comfy made a hardly perceptible but deeply significant bow as he beamed at the Prime Minister with this small – yet lethal, stroke of genius.

‘Sir, Comfy. Have I ever said,’ and a smile broke across the face of the Prime Minister, ‘that your mind should be preserved for all eternity in vintage Don Perignon?’

‘On one or two occasions, sir,’ bowing obsequiously and pitching a balding pate at the PM’s broad grin.

‘Well on this occasion you are approaching an ‘Order of the Garter’ or something higher. Is there an honour higher – in terms of intimate underwear?

His mind was veering off track and was quickly re-focused.

Now, I want this done straight away anyway. Get her out of bed if necessary. Persuade the changeling that leaving Europe is a very bad idea…you know all the impenetrable arguments. She has to be persuaded to be positive about ‘Britain’s leading role in Europe in the twenty first century…all that stuff. By what ever means, short of water boarding…or perhaps?

Sir Comfy interrupted the prime minister’s illegal thoughts.

‘May I suggest that we generously sponsor her journeying across the Channel and exploring Europe at the tax payers expense…’

‘Yes, yes, brilliant, send her over there to see what marvellous roads and railways they have from being members of the EU – hospitals brimming with doctors and nurses, border forces that actually keep out immigrants, mutual economic co-operation and trade, the Euro fighter, the Eurofighter song contest – Sir Cliff Richard, Euro football! It’s a fine and happy place Europe and clearly living in England has given her a understanding of only the worst aspects of European membership. Broken roads, haemorraging hospitals…’

Sir Comfy gave that imperceptible look that warned of a hole being dug and took a reverent pace backwards, walked out of the PM’s office and pulled the doors behind him.

‘Thank you Clive. Thank you.’

The PM leaned back in his creaky leather swivel chair and perched his shoes in the centre of his desk, linking both hands behind his head in the ‘thinking’ position.

This repulsive Victory Cake may still be voraciously consumed and I will continue in public office with my party and the whole country behind me.

If you have ever been to Morocco, you will have seen abandoned plastic taken to a new level of street art. The roads, once lined with cherry and almond blossom, now carry volumous remants of someone’s shopping, sometime ago, somewhere. Ironically the day I first travelled in Morocco, I was told by my guide (who sounded disappointed) that there is normally more plastic by the roadside. That day it had been cleared away because the King of Morocco was scheduled to pass by – evidenced by smartly dressed policemen at every roundabout.

As you drive down many some country roads in England you will see weird black shapes draped in the trees. These are amiably referred to by local folk as witches knickers, presumably on account of the low flying stunts some perform.

Plastic, in it’s most pernicious form – bags, is due to take over the world. It’s already doing a pretty good job in the seas and has appeared as a meal to many a hungry sea mammal and fish. Now, we are told that as we eat the fish, we are consuming micro plastic. There is a place in one Ocean where currents bring together a country sized raft made of plastic bags; a new shipping hazard and a clear sign that we are out of control as custodians of planet earth.

Kenya is leading the rest of the world, having just announced a complete ban on plastic bags. According to the BBC News website, anyone found selling, making or carrying a plastic bag could be fined 38,000 dollars or face four years in prison. Presumably this means that the purchase of a box of twenty Kenyan tea bags wrapped in plastic sachets will land you in prison for eighty years. Good luck with enforcing that law as the 24 million plastic bags used each month in Kenya are going to fill the prisons, not many being able to pay the 3,040,00 dollar fine for the box of tea bags.

So what is the alternative? Many will remember market stall holders popping apples and pears into brown paper bags, several decades ago. But we are told, also on the BBC News, that a paper bag uses three times more carbon in it’s manufacturer and transportation. I have to query the inclusion of transportation in this statistic as any bag needs to be transported; unless the argument is that paper bags are heavier, in which case don’t transport them in a lorry that goes one way and comes back empty as most do in the UK!

The conversion of wood into paper using as little carbon as possible is clearly something that needs to be researched now! Traditional Japanese paper making techniques use nothing more than large tubs, trays, a local river and a pair of hands. Surely this process can be unscaled and factories run on carbon neutral energy sources. The problem is viewed as how we do things now, rather than taking in the bigger picture and fixing the it with new tools.

I have just finished clearing out the boot of my car, hundreds of minute shreds of plastic from a ‘bag for life’ that tore down one side. Provided they are capable of lasting several decades in normal use, this has to be a good solution to the problem in theory, if not in practice. Such a bag we are told, must be used four times to compensate for the extra resources put into it. A good solution if it can survive five trips to the shops!

I don’t know where biodegradable plastic features in the debate, as it is rarely considered. I expect it is going to be more expensive, but its use would be one strategy to give due respect for nature. In countries where supermarkets charge for the use of a plastic carrier bag, the extra cost is administered as a sort of ‘fine’ to deter use and encourage re-use. The effect, although welcome, is never going to solve the problem. The money charged could be made to pay for a biodegradable bag, but I have never heard of this in practice.

I have a fun discussion with some friends over dinner the other night, about a supermarket that requires customers to weigh their own fruit and vegetables, place each type in an oversized plastic bag, weigh it and attach a price label. The system is absurdly heavy in it’s use of bags protecting fruit and vegetables which very often have already a protecting layer provided by nature. I began to think creatively about fruit and veggie boxes, designed to be brought to and from supermarkets by customers. The green townies have their fruit and veg’ delivered in reused cardboard boxes, so why can’t it work in supermarkets too. A box could be designed to have compartments suitable for particularly soft items, with moulded shapes and maybe lids. The compartment could be modular and replaceable for seasonal variations. However it might be done, there is a design brief there for an industrial designer with imagination. The public and supermarkets clearly have a demand for it.

The King has No Clothes is a well known story where the subject no one speaks about is the King’s nudity, because he is King. Perhaps it is about time that Kings are made to wake up to the massive problem of waste disposal, rather than everyone carrying on as if everything is normal.

America is a country with twice the number of gun owners than anywhere else in the world. This prevalence has been proven to be directly linked to the number of mass shootings. And yet, no administration has found the abolition of guns a vote winner. What do Americans want?

Many gun owners, when asked, say they carry a gun for self defence. In my view this is like saying they have a movie facility on their camera because they want to make block busting feature films. Storage, familiarisation, maintenance, firearm safety, traumamantic wound treatment, target practice, and scenario simulation is not something obtained from a gun store.

Why do police forces in America allocate time and resources to officers in the use of guns, whilst citizens do not?

What problem does citizen gun ownership solve? For the founding fathers who had seen revolution and tyranny in Europe, they wanted to know that a citizen militia could overthrow a malevolent government. That is understandable although raises the question what is the difference between a righteous citizen militia and a rebellious section of society seeking to challenge government by the use of force. Were the confederate soldiers ‘rebels’ or a righteous militia?

Why is the second amendment ambiguous? It declares the right for militias to be formed and then adds that the people can bear arms. Are these the same? Did they mean ‘people’ as in a militia made up from the ranks of the ‘people’? Whatever was intended, today the result is that anybody has the right to carry a weapon whether they are part of the National Guard, or not.

So Americans defend the right to amateurism at it’s most extreme, and are surprised when it all goes wrong mass shootings occur? Or parents mistakenly shoot their teenage sons and daughters returning late at night through the bedroom window.

Fighting is not natural to most people. Children include fighting in their learning, but after a certain age most abandon violence as a way to settle disputes. Self defence is usually only necessary when a random event takes place over which the victim has no control. For instance returning to a parked car late at night you are approached by a group of men in hoodies who demand your wallet and threaten violence. Even in this situation, violent self defence is not necessary. You just hand over your wallet. Self defence relates to one’s body, not property or territory, or even someone else’s body…except in the case of a parent and child or adult physically or mentally vulnerable person.

Many teenagers in the United Kingdom carry knives for ‘self defence’. They have watched the films where the Karate Kid or John Wayne magically over come an enemy. How about that showgirl who throws a knife and pins the sheriffs hat to the door. Great isn’t it? But real life is not as simple. Buying a knife is simple but knowing how to use it to defend oneself, is not. Ask a professional knife fighter and if you are still keen, sign up for a two year course and health insurance.

Even when you learn to fight with no weapon, the best advise I was ever given was run. That advice was given me by a European Karate Champion who was teaching street fighting.

So America, again I ask the question what problem are you trying to solve with gun ownership? If you want to feel safe in the streets there are a hundred ways of achieving this before you reach ‘carrying a gun’. If you don’t want a fool for a president, don’t vote for one. Walking into Washington as part of an ‘America for Americans’ armed militia  you will all be shot because the police and military train to do that, you don’t.

In reality America has created a public health problem as a result of gun ownership. Mass shootings are measured by dead bodies, but don’t forget the wounded. And as in all violent acts, there is a ripple effect of fear and confusion through the families and communities in which these acts take place. The health of American citizens is being seriously ravaged by gun ownership, and if a constitution ever needed amendment, now is the time.

I have had an inflatable globe for several years. It has helped me when searching for obscure countries described in the news. Or working out how the earth’s tilt affects seasons, just one last time before I forget again. Somehow the three dimensional view of planet earth is so much more interesting than those flattened impressions in books.

But, and here comes the problem, it lately started to deflate. A few days after blowing it up from the convenient valve in the north pole, my planet earth has begun to sag. And like all people who tend to think in metaphors, this elementary story made me explore in my mind how the real planet earth is beginning to sag. I mean, how much more damage can it take? After 2016 was measured to be the hottest in the last 800,000 years few can still support the argument against climate by saying change is normal. Of course change is normal; that is not what is being measured. What is apparent is a significant sag in the jowls. She’s looking like an old lady this wonderful planet of ours although she still has millions of years to live. The presence of these little things called humans is a thorn in her side and she is losing puff.

We can see this in many ways. One is the issue of ‘light pollution’. Photographs from near earth orbit taken of the parts of the globe in darkness, reveal a terrible beauty. Parts of Europe appear to be in the midst of fire-storms,. Cities and conurbations lurk in the centre of fibre optic pathways of light leading to phosphorescent coastal fringes. So much so that animals, insects and plants, living in those areas are confused in their diurnal cycles. Trees are coming to leaf too early.

And yet, of all the ‘environmental problems’ which land on ministers desks with an estimate or invoice attached, this is one of the cheapest to fix. We don’t need a lot of the light, for instance. It’s just light spilt from badly designed luminaires. Levels of light needed are assumed to be high, when in fact the human eye needs contrast rather than a lot of light. Many people feel unsafe in dark streets, and yet if they examined the situation more rationally, they might be safer in the dark. No one can see you in the dark. When I was in the army we learnt to operate in darkness. In training we had to polish our black boots in total darkness whilst maintaining an all round defensive position in a wood.

Getting used to less light is a small ask and actually, a cost saving measure. Until those who make decisions on our behalf can do the easy environmental fixes, how are they ever going to find the intention and the means to fix the big stuff? Trumpty Dumpty will have to maintain email links with his ‘climate change denial’ chums because it suits American big business.

I wonder if he was somehow propelled into space and looked down at a deflating earth, whether this change of view, would change his view on the global issue that generations of earthlings are spinning towards at astronomical speeds. Will he cry when he sees the half deceased Great Barrier Reef; the largest half living thing visible from spance?

Perhaps the scariest aspect of the dying earth scenario is the current plan to move to Mars.

The argument is that this is what man has always done. Explored. That is true in the historical situations when people could ‘go west’ into pristine, unspoilt lands. But that isn’t possible any longer. The people of Easter Island, knocked down all the trees and died out because there was nowhere else they could go. Mars is a similar Ocean away and unsuitable for sustained life. It is not heaven. Heaven is here on earth.

As a footnote I will say that at the north pole, we still have a quick fix. Pull out the stopper, blow into it and put the stopper back in tight. It worked on my globe for a few days.